(a) Standardized
amounts. Unless a covered swap entity’s initial margin model
conforms to the requirements of this section, the covered swap entity
shall calculate the amount of initial margin required to be collected
or posted for one or more non-cleared swaps or non-cleared security-based
swaps with a given counterparty pursuant to section 237.3 on a daily
basis pursuant to appendix A of this subpart.
(b) Use of initial margin models. A covered
swap entity may calculate the amount of initial margin required to
be collected or posted for one or more non-cleared swaps or non-cleared
security-based swaps with a given counterparty pursuant to section
237.3 on a daily basis using an initial margin model only if the initial
margin model meets the requirements of this section.
(c) Requirements for initial margin model.
(1) A covered swap entity
must obtain the prior written approval of the Board before using any
initial margin model to calculate the initial margin required in this
subpart.
(2) A covered swap entity
must demonstrate that the initial margin model satisfies all of the
requirements of this section on an ongoing basis.
(3) A covered swap entity must notify the
Board in writing 60 days prior to:
(i) Extending the use of an initial
margin model that the Board has approved under this section to an
additional product type;
(ii)
Making any change to any initial margin model approved by the Board
under this section that would result in a material change in the covered
swap entity’s assessment of initial margin requirements; or
(iii) Making any material change to
modeling assumptions used by the initial margin model.
(4) The Board may rescind its approval
of the use of any initial margin model, in whole or in part, or may
impose additional conditions or requirements if the Board determines,
in its sole discretion, that the initial margin model no longer complies
with this section.
(d) Quantitative requirements.
(1) The covered swap entity’s initial margin
model must calculate an amount of initial margin that is equal to
the potential future exposure of the non-cleared swap, non-cleared
security-based swap or netting portfolio of non-cleared swaps or non-cleared
security-based swaps covered by an eligible master netting agreement.
Potential future exposure is an estimate of the one-tailed 99 percent
confidence interval for an increase in the value of the non-cleared
swap, non-cleared security-based swap or netting portfolio of non-cleared
swaps or non-cleared security-based swaps due to an instantaneous
price shock that is equivalent to a movement in all material underlying
risk factors, including prices, rates, and spreads, over a holding
period equal to the shorter of ten business days or the maturity of
the non-cleared swap, non-cleared security-based swap or netting portfolio.
(2) All data used to calibrate the
initial margin model must be based on an equally weighted historical
observation period of at least one year and not more than five years
and must incorporate a period of significant financial stress for
each broad asset class that is appropriate to the non-cleared swaps
and non-cleared security-based swaps to which the initial margin model
is applied.
(3) The covered swap
entity’s initial margin model must use risk factors sufficient to
measure all material price risks inherent in the transactions for
which initial margin is being calculated. The risk categories must
include, but should not be limited to, foreign exchange or interest
rate risk, credit risk, equity risk, and commodity risk, as appropriate.
For material exposures in significant currencies and markets, modeling
techniques must capture spread and basis risk and must incorporate
a sufficient number of segments of the yield curve to capture differences
in volatility and imperfect correlation of rates along the yield curve.
(4) In the case of a non-cleared cross-currency
swap, the covered swap entity’s initial margin model need not recognize
any risks or risk factors associated with the fixed, physically-settled
foreign exchange transaction associated with the exchange of principal
embedded in the non-cleared cross-currency swap. The initial margin
model must recognize all material risks and risk factors associated
with all other payments and cash flows that occur during the life
of the non-cleared cross-currency swap.
(5) The initial margin model may calculate
initial margin for a non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based
swap or a netting portfolio of non-cleared swaps or non-cleared security-based
swaps covered by an eligible master netting agreement. It may reflect
offsetting exposures, diversification, and other hedging benefits
for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps that are
governed by the same eligible master netting agreement by incorporating
empirical correlations within the following broad risk categories,
provided the covered swap entity validates and demonstrates the reasonableness
of its process for modeling and measuring hedging benefits: Commodity,
credit, equity, and foreign exchange or interest rate. Empirical correlations
under an eligible master netting agreement may be recognized by the
initial margin model within each broad risk category, but not across
broad risk categories.
(6) If the
initial margin model does not explicitly reflect offsetting exposures,
diversification, and hedging benefits between subsets of non-cleared
swaps or non-cleared security-based swaps within a broad risk category,
the covered swap entity must calculate an amount of initial margin
separately for each subset within which such relationships are explicitly
recognized by the initial margin model. The sum of the initial margin
amounts calculated for each subset of non-cleared swaps and non-cleared
security-based swaps within a broad risk category will be used to
determine the aggregate initial margin due from the counterparty for
the portfolio of non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based
swaps within the broad risk category.
(7) The sum of the initial margin amounts calculated for each broad
risk category will be used to determine the aggregate initial margin
due from the counterparty.
(8) The
initial margin model may not permit the calculation of any initial
margin collection amount to be offset by, or otherwise take into account,
any initial margin that may be owed or otherwise payable by the covered
swap entity to the counterparty.
(9) The initial margin model must include all material risks arising
from the nonlinear price characteristics of option positions or positions
with embedded optionality and the sensitivity of the market value
of the positions to changes in the volatility of the underlying rates,
prices, or other material risk factors.
(10) The covered swap entity may not omit
any risk factor from the calculation of its initial margin that the
covered swap entity uses in its initial margin model unless it has
first demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Board that such omission
is appropriate.
(11) The covered
swap entity may not incorporate any proxy or approximation used to
capture the risks of the covered swap entity’s non-cleared swaps or
non-cleared security-based swaps unless it has first demonstrated
to the satisfaction of the Board that such proxy or approximation
is appropriate.
(12) The covered
swap entity must have a rigorous and well-defined process for re-estimating,
re-evaluating, and updating its internal margin model to ensure continued
applicability and relevance.
(13)
The covered swap entity must review and, as necessary, revise the
data used to calibrate the initial margin model at least annually,
and more frequently as market conditions warrant, to ensure that the
data incorporate a period of significant financial stress appropriate
to the non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps to which
the initial margin model is applied.
(14) The level of sophistication of the initial margin model must
be commensurate with the complexity of the non-cleared swaps
and non-cleared security-based swaps to which it is applied. In calculating
an initial margin collection amount, the initial margin model may
make use of any of the generally accepted approaches for modeling
the risk of a single instrument or portfolio of instruments.
(15) The Board may in its sole discretion
require a covered swap entity using an initial margin model to collect
a greater amount of initial margin than that determined by the covered
swap entity’s initial margin model if the Board determines that the
additional collateral is appropriate due to the nature, structure,
or characteristics of the covered swap entity’s transaction(s), or
is commensurate with the risks associated with the transaction(s).
(e) Periodic review. A covered swap entity must periodically, but no less frequently
than annually, review its initial margin model in light of developments
in financial markets and modeling technologies, and enhance the initial
margin model as appropriate to ensure that the initial margin model
continues to meet the requirements for approval in this section.
(f) Control, oversight, and validation
mechanisms.
(1) The
covered swap entity must maintain a risk control unit that reports
directly to senior management and is independent from the business
trading units.
(2) The covered swap
entity’s risk control unit must validate its initial margin model
prior to implementation and on an ongoing basis. The covered swap
entity’s validation process must be independent of the development,
implementation, and operation of the initial margin model, or the
validation process must be subject to an independent review of its
adequacy and effectiveness. The validation process must include:
(i) An evaluation of
the conceptual soundness of (including developmental evidence supporting)
the initial margin model;
(ii)
An ongoing monitoring process that includes verification of processes
and benchmarking by comparing the covered swap entity’s initial margin
model outputs (estimation of initial margin) with relevant alternative
internal and external data sources or estimation techniques. The benchmark(s)
must address the chosen model’s limitations. When applicable, the
covered swap entity should consider benchmarks that allow for non-normal
distributions such as historical and Monte Carlo simulations. When
applicable, validation shall include benchmarking against observable
margin standards to ensure that the initial margin required is not
less than what a derivatives clearing organization or a clearing agency
would require for similar cleared transactions; and
(iii) An outcomes analysis process that
includes backtesting the initial margin model. This analysis must
recognize and compensate for the challenges inherent in backtesting
over periods that do not contain significant financial stress.
(3) If the validation
process reveals any material problems with the initial margin model,
the covered swap entity must promptly notify the Board of the problems,
describe to the Board any remedial actions being taken, and adjust
the initial margin model to ensure an appropriately conservative amount
of required initial margin is being calculated.
(4) The covered swap entity must have an
internal audit function independent of business-line management and
the risk control unit that at least annually assesses the effectiveness
of the controls supporting the covered swap entity’s initial margin
model measurement systems, including the activities of the business
trading units and risk control unit, compliance with policies and
procedures, and calculation of the covered swap entity’s initial margin
requirements under this subpart. At least annually, the internal audit
function must report its findings to the covered swap entity’s board
of directors or a committee thereof.
(g) Documentation. The covered swap entity
must adequately document all material aspects of its initial margin
model, including the management and valuation of the non-cleared swaps
and non-cleared security-based swaps to which it applies, the control,
oversight, and validation of the initial margin model, any review
processes and the results of such processes.
(h) Escalation procedures. The covered swap
entity must adequately document internal authorization procedures,
including escalation procedures, that require review and approval
of any change to the initial margin calculation under the initial
margin model, demonstrable analysis that any basis for any such change
is consistent with the requirements of this section, and independent
review of such demonstrable analysis and approval.