SECTION 229.39—Insolvency
of Bank
A. Introduction 1. These provisions cover situations where a bank
becomes insolvent during collection or return of a check. Paragraphs
(a), (b), and (d) of section 229.39 are derived from UCC 4-216. They
are intended to apply to all banks. Like UCC 4-216, paragraphs (a),
(b), and (d) of section 229.39 are intended to establish the point
in the collection process at which collection or return of a check
should be either stopped or continued when a particular bank suspends
payments. Section 229.39(a) sets forth the circumstances under which
the receiver must stop collection or return and, instead, send the
check back to the bank or customer that transferred the check. Section
229.39(b) sets forth the circumstances under which the collection
or return of the check should continue. Paragraphs (a) and (b) of
section 229.39 are not intended to confer upon banks preferential
positions in the event of bank failures over general depositors or
any other creditor of the failed bank. (See UCC 4-216, cmt.
1).
B. 229.39(a) Duty of Receiver
to Return Unpaid Checks1. This paragraph
requires a receiver of a closed bank to return a check to the prior
bank if the paying bank or the receiver did not pay for the check.
This permits the prior bank, as holder, to pursue its claims against
the closed bank or prior indorsers on the check.
C. 229.39(b) Claims Against Banks for Checks Not
Returned by the Receiver1. This section
sets forth the claims available to banks in situations in which a
receiver does not return a check under section 229.39(a). In those
situations, the prior bank would not be a holder of the check and
would be unable to pursue claims as a holder.
9-531
2. Paragraph (b)(1)
of section 229.39 gives a bank a claim against a closed paying bank
that finally pays a check without settling for it or a closed depositary
bank that becomes obligated to pay a returned check without settling
for it. If the bank with a claim under this paragraph recovers from
a prior bank or other party to the check, the prior bank or other
party to the check is subrogated to the claim.
9-532
3. Paragraph (b)(2) of section 229.39 gives a bank a claim against
a closed collecting bank, paying bank, or returning bank that receives
settlement for but does not make settlement for a check. (See commentary to section 229.35(b) for discussion of prior and subsequent
banks). As in the case of section 229.39(b)(1), if the bank with a
claim under this paragraph recovers from a prior bank or other party
to the check, the prior bank or other party to the check is subrogated
to the claim.
9-533
D. 229.39(c) Preferred Claim Against
Presenting Bank for Breach of Warranty1. This
paragraph gives a paying bank a preferred claim against a closed presenting
bank in the event that the presenting bank breaches an amount or encoding
warranty as provided in section 229.34(c)(1) or (3) and does not reimburse
the paying bank for adjustments for a settlement made by the paying
bank in excess of the value of the checks presented. This preferred
claim is intended to have the effect of a perfected security interest
and is intended to put the paying bank in the position of a secured
creditor for purposes of the receivership provisions of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act and similar provisions of state law.
9-534
E. 229.39(d) Finality of Settlement1. This paragraph provides that insolvency does not
interfere with the finality of a settlement, such as a settlement
by a paying bank that becomes final by expiration of the midnight
deadline.