Q1. What is the duty of a depository institution if
it discovers that an IBF time deposit or IBF loan is not in fact being
used to support operations outside the United States?
A. A depository institution must
keep reserves against IBF liabilities that do not meet the requirements
of Regulations D and Q and, in addition, comply with interest-rate
restrictions of Regulation Q. IBF assets which do not meet those requirements
must be transferred from the IBF to the domestic books. An institution
will be expected to communicate with its customers to determine that
the requirements are understood and followed.
Q2. Does the requirement that an IBF time deposit “support
operations outside the United States” require that the source of funds
arise solely out of operations outside of the United States?
A. Not necessarily. For example, capital supplied by a
United States parent to a foreign office or subsidiary may be deposited
in an IBF if the purpose of the transaction was to support the non-United
States operations of the company. Funds may not be deposited by a
United States office to obtain indirectly the favorable regulatory treatment
on an IBF deposit.
2-309.71
Q3. Is a loan to a foreign corporation for the purpose
of acquiring an existing United States corporation in a takeover bid
considered to be for a foreign purpose?
A. No.
Q4. What documentation must a bank maintain to demonstrate
that IBF loans and deposits are being used to support operations outside
the United States?
A. Any internal memorandum or file documenting that notice
has been sent, and in the case of non-United States subsidiaries or
affiliates of United States residents, a copy of the acknowledgment
should be retained. An IBF should maintain the same type of documentation
concerning IBF loans as it routinely maintains with respect to other
types of loans.
2-309.72
Q5. With respect to IBF deposits, what restrictions
does the “support of foreign operations” test impose on the IBF’s
establishing institution, IBF depositors, and payees of funds from
a matured IBF deposit?
A. The support test for IBF deposits is intended to ensure
that an IBF depositor places in IBFs only those funds that are used
in connection with the depositor’s (or its affiliates’) foreign operations.
The Board is relying to a certain extent on banks’ knowing
their customers. As part of its general responsibilities to ensure
that an IBF is in compliance with the Board’s regulations, a bank
is expected to take action if it comes to its attention in the normal
course of business that a customer’s use of its IBF account is inconsistent
with the use-of-funds test. If it is unable to assure itself that
the depositor is meeting the use-of-funds requirement, then the bank
should consider moving the customer’s account from its IBF to its
domestic books or offshore.
A test does not impose restrictions on disbursal of the
proceeds of a matured IBF deposit. It should be noted that the identity
of the payee of the funds upon maturity is not conclusive on whether
the depositor in fact is using those funds to support foreign operations.
For example, the payee of a matured IBF deposit might be another United
States depository institution or nonbank. That fact alone does not
make the deposit ineligible at an IBF, it may be that the payment
to the domestic party involved the depositor’s foreign business. Also,
the fact that the payee is a foreign entity does not by itself mean
that the IBF deposit was permissible; it may be that the funds were
used to support domestic operations even though they are paid to a
foreign resident.
2-309.73
Q6. If a bank discovers in the normal course of business
that an account has not been used in accordance with the foreign operations
test or any other provisions of the IBF regulations, must the bank
reserve against the funds in the account?
A. Yes. If an account has not been used in
accordance with the regulations, then the account must be treated
as a domestic account, which means it is subject to domestic reserve
requirements and to Regulation Q. Institutions must either bring the
account into compliance or move it to the domestic or offshore books.
Q7. May an IBF depositor use an IBF deposit as security
for a loan, the proceeds of which will be used for a domestic purpose?
A. No. Use of an IBF deposit in that manner would not
constitute use of the funds solely to support foreign operations.
However, IBF deposits against which a general right of set-off exists,
either by law or contract, are not regarded as collateral or as assets
securing a loan.
2-309.74
Q8. Section 204.8(b) of Regulation D requires that
nonbank customers of an IBF receive a written statement concerning
use of an IBF only for foreign purposes. In the case of a syndicated
loan to a nonbank borrower, must all the banks in the syndicate that choose to
record the loan on the books of their IBF send such a statement to
the borrower, or may only the agent bank in the syndicate do so?
A. Only the agent of a syndicate needs to send the written
statement. If the borrower is an affiliate of a United States resident,
the return statement need be sent by the borrower to the agent only;
however, the members of the syndicate should obtain a copy of the
borrower’s letter for their records in order to ensure compliance
with Regulation D.
Q9. When is the written notice and acknowledgment provided
for in section 204.8(b) required to be given to a nonbank customer
in connection with the opening of an IBF time deposit; in connection
with establishing a nonbinding line of credit?
A. Section 204.8(b) states that a written notice
must be given to an IBF customer at the time a deposit relationship
or credit relationship is first established. A deposit relationship
is established when a debtor/creditor relationship arises, and that
occurs when funds are deposited to an account. Accordingly, the notice
must be provided prior to that time. A credit relationship arises,
not when the funds are disbursed, but when the commitment is made.
Accordingly, the notice must be provided prior to the time that the
funds are disbursed.
2-309.75
Q10. The answer to question 9 above states that the
written notice must be provided when the commitment to lend is made
in connection with the establishing of a nonbinding line of credit.
However, the commitment to lend is not made when the nonbinding line
is first arranged, but at some later time when it is mutually agreed
that the party wants to borrow and the bank is willing to lend. Must
the notice be provided and acknowledgment obtained at the initial
point when the nonbinding line is arranged, or at the later point
when the parties became committed?
A. The notice must be provided and the acknowledgment
obtained at the time the bank is committed to lend, not when a nonbinding
line of credit is arranged. However, it is permissible to give notice
to such customer and obtain the acknowledgment, if required, at the
time the nonbinding line is arranged and such notice and acknowledgment
will fulfill the notice and acknowledgment requirements for IBF loans
to that customer.
Q11. Do the notice and acknowledgment requirements
and limitations on the use of funds apply to foreign currency deposits
and foreign currency loans?
A. Yes.
2-309.76
Q12. Is the notice to IBF depositors required to be
received by the depositor before an institution accepts funds to be
placed in an IBF time deposit? For example, if a nonbank customer
that has never received a notice of the Board’s policy informs an
institution by telephone that it intends to make a wire transfer of
funds for placement in an IBF account that day, can the institution
accept the funds, and then send the written notice out to the customer
that same day? In the case of a foreign subsidiary or affiliate of
a domestic corporation, must the institution receive the acknowledgment
before it accepts the funds?
A. An institution may accept the wire transfer of funds
for deposit to an IBF account prior to the receipt of the notice by
the IBF customer and, when required, prior to the receipt of the acknowledgment, provided that the customer is notified orally or by wire of
the support test and that the notice is sent with the confirmation
of the transaction.
Q13. May a bank incorporate in its loan or deposit
agreement the notice regarding the limitations on the use of IBF loan
or deposit proceeds and, if required, the acknowledgment of those
limitations and thereby satisfy its obligation to provide the notice
to and receive the acknowledgment from IBF customers?
A. Yes.
2-309.77
Q14. If
the IBF customer is a foreign government, is written notice of the
Board’s policy regarding IBF deposits and loans necessary?
A. No. It is required only for non-United States
residents, and foreign offices or subsidiaries of a domestic corporation.
Q15.
The Board’s letter of January 12, 1982 (at 2-263) states that IBFs may purchase securities in the secondary market
so long as those securities are IBF-eligible. Is it permissible for
an IBF to rely on a written statement from the obligor obtained by
a prior IBF purchaser to the effect that that security was eligible? A. Yes. An IBF may rely on such a statement from
another IBF. However, the purchasing IBF must obtain a written copy
of the obligor’s statement at or very near to the time that it makes
the purchase. This is necessary to provide assurance that IBFs are
making correct eligibility determinations.
2-309.78
Q16. In
the notice announcing the addition of section 204.8 to Regulation
D (46 Fed. Reg. 32426 (June 23, 1981)), footnote 2 of the supplemental
information states that written notice need not be given to IBF customers
associated with assets transferred to the IBF within the four-week
exemption period. Does this also apply to deposits that are so transferred?
A. No. Only assets are covered by the exemption.
If a deposit is transferred, the bank is necessarily required to contact
the customer in order to determine whether the funds in the account
will be used for foreign purposes. With respect to deposits transferred,
only the written notice of the Board’s policy must be given and the
acknowledgment obtained, if required. No subsequent contact to determine
the use of funds is required.
It may be necessary for a bank to contact loan customers
in order to determine the purpose of the loan, but this is not required
if the bank can determine the purpose from existing loan documentation.
Although the “use of proceeds” test applies to loans transferred to
the IBF from United States or non-United States offices of the establishing
entity, notice to customers regarding the test is not required, provided
that the loan was originally made prior to establishing the IBF. If
the purpose of a loan is not clear from existing documentation, and
the knowledgeable loan officer cannot provide sufficient clarification,
then contact with the customer may be necessary to determine that
loan proceeds are being used only to support operations outside the
United States.
2-309.79
Q17. Can
an institution transfer an existing deposit on its books to its IBF
without giving the IBF notice requirements?
A. No, it is necessary to give the notice to, and obtain the acknowledgment,
if required, from a customer at the time the deposit is shifted. Notice
need be given to and the relevant acknowledgment obtained from an
IBF customer only one time.