4(a) Data Format
and Itemization 1. General. Except as otherwise provided in section 1003.3, section
1003.4(a) describes a financial institution’s obligation to
collect data on applications it received, on covered loans that it
originated, and on covered loans that it purchased during the calendar
year covered by the loan/application register.
i. A financial institution reports these
data even if the covered loans were subsequently sold by the institution.
ii. A financial institution
reports data for applications that did not result in an origination
but on which actions were taken—for example, an application
that the institution denied, that it approved but that was not accepted,
that it closed for incompleteness, or that the applicant withdrew
during the calendar year covered by the loan/application register.
A financial institution is required to report data regarding requests
under a preapproval program (as defined in section 1003.2(b)(2)) only
if the preapproval request is denied, results in the origination of
a home purchase loan, or was approved but not accepted.
iii. If a financial institution
acquires covered loans in bulk from another institution (for example,
from the receiver for a failed institution), but no merger or acquisition
of an institution, or acquisition of a branch office, is involved,
the acquiring financial institution reports the covered loans as purchased
loans.
iv. A financial
institution reports the data for an application on the loan/application register
for the calendar year during which the application was acted upon
even if the institution received the application in a previous calendar
year.
2. Originations
and applications involving more than one institution. Section
1003.4(a) requires a financial institution to collect certain information
regarding applications for covered loans that it receives and regarding
covered loans that it originates. The following provides guidance
on how to report originations and applications involving more than
one institution. The discussion below assumes that all of the parties
are financial institutions as defined by section 1003.2(g). The same
principles apply if any of the parties is not a financial institution.
Comment 4(a)-3 provides examples of transactions involving more than
one institution, and comment 4(a)-4 discusses how to report actions
taken by agents.
i. Only one financial institution reports
each originated covered loan as an origination. If more than one institution
was involved in the origination of a covered loan, the financial institution
that made the credit decision approving the application before closing
or account opening reports the loan as an origination. It is not relevant
whether the loan closed or, in the case of an application, would have
closed in the institution’s name. If more than one institution
approved an application prior to closing or account opening and one
of those institutions purchased the loan after closing, the institution
that purchased the loan after closing reports the loan as an origination.
If a financial institution reports a transaction as an origination,
it reports all of the information required for originations, even
if the covered loan was not initially payable to the financial institution
that is reporting the covered loan as an origination.
ii. In the case of an application for a
covered loan that did not result in an origination, a financial institution
reports the action it took on that application if it made a credit
decision on the application or was reviewing the application when
the application was withdrawn or closed for incompleteness. It is
not relevant whether the financial institution received the application
from the applicant or from another institution, such as a broker,
or whether another financial institution also reviewed and reported
an action taken on the same application.
3. Examples—originations and applications
involving more than one institution. The following scenarios
illustrate how an institution reports a particular application or
covered loan. The illustrations assume that all of the parties are
financial institutions as defined by section 1003.2(g). However, the
same principles apply if any of the parties is not a financial institution.
i. Financial Institution A
received an application for a covered loan from an applicant and forwarded
that application to Financial Institution B. Financial Institution
B reviewed the application and approved the loan prior to closing.
The loan closed in Financial Institution A’s name. Financial
Institution B purchased the loan from Financial Institution A after
closing. Financial Institution B was not acting as Financial Institution
A’s agent. Since Financial Institution B made the credit decision
prior to closing, Financial Institution B reports the transaction
as an origination, not as a purchase. Financial Institution A does
not report the transaction.
ii. Financial Institution A received an
application for a covered loan from an applicant and forwarded that
application to Financial Institution B. Financial Institution B reviewed
the application before the loan would have closed, but the application
did not result in an origination because Financial Institution B denied
the application. Financial Institution B was not acting as Financial
Institution A’s agent. Since Financial Institution B made the
credit decision, Financial Institution B reports the application as
a denial. Financial Institution A does not report the application.
If, under the same facts, the application was withdrawn before Financial
Institution B made a credit decision, Financial Institution B would
report the application as withdrawn and Financial Institution A would not
report the application.
iii. Financial Institution A received an application for a covered
loan from an applicant and approved the application before closing
the loan in its name. Financial Institution A was not acting as Financial
Institution B’s agent. Financial Institution B purchased the
covered loan from Financial Institution A. Financial Institution B
did not review the application before closing. Financial Institution
A reports the loan as an origination. Financial Institution B reports
the loan as a purchase.
iv. Financial Institution A received an application for a covered
loan from an applicant. If approved, the loan would have closed in
Financial Institution B’s name. Financial Institution A denied
the application without sending it to Financial Institution B for
approval. Financial Institution A was not acting as Financial Institution
B’s agent. Since Financial Institution A made the credit decision
before the loan would have closed, Financial Institution A reports
the application. Financial Institution B does not report the application.
v. Financial Institution
A reviewed an application and made the credit decision to approve
a covered loan using the underwriting criteria provided by a third
party (e.g., another financial institution, Fannie Mae, or Freddie
Mac). The third party did not review the application and did not make
a credit decision prior to closing. Financial Institution A was not
acting as the third party’s agent. Financial Institution A reports
the application or origination. If the third party purchased the loan
and is subject to Regulation C, the third party reports the loan as
a purchase whether or not the third party reviewed the loan after
closing. Assume the same facts, except that Financial Institution
A approved the application, and the applicant chose not to accept
the loan from Financial Institution A. Financial Institution A reports
the application as approved but not accepted and the third party,
assuming the third party is subject to Regulation C, does not report
the application.
vi.
Financial Institution A reviewed and made the credit decision on an
application based on the criteria of a third-party insurer or guarantor
(for example, a government or private insurer or guarantor). Financial
Institution A reports the action taken on the application.
vii. Financial Institution
A received an application for a covered loan and forwarded it to Financial
Institutions B and C. Financial Institution A made a credit decision,
acting as Financial Institution D’s agent, and approved the
application. The applicant did not accept the loan from Financial
Institution D. Financial Institution D reports the application as
approved but not accepted. Financial Institution A does not report
the application. Financial Institution B made a credit decision, approving
the application, the applicant accepted the offer of credit from Financial
Institution B, and credit was extended. Financial Institution B reports
the origination. Financial Institution C made a credit decision and
denied the application. Financial Institution C reports the application
as denied.
4. Agents. If a financial institution made the credit decision
on a covered loan or application through the actions of an agent,
the institution reports the application or origination. State law
determines whether one party is the agent of another. For example,
acting as Financial Institution A’s agent, Financial Institution
B approved an application prior to closing and a covered loan was
originated. Financial Institution A reports the loan as an origination.
5. Purchased loans.
i. A financial institution
is required to collect data regarding covered loans it purchases.
For purposes of section 1003.4(a), a purchase includes a repurchase
of a covered loan, regardless of whether the institution chose to
repurchase the covered loan or was required to repurchase the covered
loan because of a contractual obligation and regardless of whether
the repurchase occurs within the same calendar year that the covered
loan was originated or in a different calendar year. For example, assume
that Financial Institution A originates or purchases a covered loan
and then sells it to Financial Institution B, who later requires Financial
Institution A to repurchase the covered loan pursuant to the relevant
contractual obligations. Financial Institution B reports the purchase
from Financial Institution A, assuming it is a financial institution
as defined under section 1003.2(g). Financial Institution A reports
the repurchase from Financial Institution B as a purchase.
ii. In contrast, for purposes
of section 1003.4(a), a purchase does not include a temporary transfer
of a covered loan to an interim funder or warehouse creditor as part
of an interim funding agreement under which the originating financial
institution is obligated to repurchase the covered loan for sale to
a subsequent investor. Such agreements, often referred to as “repurchase
agreements,” are sometimes employed as functional equivalents
of warehouse lines of credit. Under these agreements, the interim
funder or warehouse creditor acquires legal title to the covered loan,
subject to an obligation of the originating institution to repurchase
at a future date, rather than taking a security interest in the covered
loan as under the terms of a more conventional warehouse line of credit.
To illustrate, assume Financial Institution A has an interim funding
agreement with Financial Institution B to enable Financial Institution
B to originate loans. Assume further that Financial Institution B
originates a covered loan and that, pursuant to this agreement, Financial
Institution A takes a temporary transfer of the covered loan until
Financial Institution B arranges for the sale of the covered loan
to a subsequent investor and that Financial Institution B repurchases
the covered loan to enable it to complete the sale to the subsequent
investor (alternatively, Financial Institution A may transfer the
covered loan directly to the subsequent investor at Financial Institution
B’s direction, pursuant to the interim funding agreement). The
subsequent investor could be, for example, a financial institution
or other entity that intends to hold the loan in portfolio, a GSE
or other securitizer, or a financial institution or other entity that
intends to package and sell multiple loans to a GSE or other securitizer.
In this example, the temporary transfer of the covered loan from Financial
Institution B to Financial Institution A is not a purchase, and any
subsequent transfer back to Financial Institution B for delivery to
the subsequent investor is not a purchase, for purposes of section
1003.4(a). Financial Institution B reports the origination of the
covered loan as well as its sale to the subsequent investor. If the
subsequent investor is a financial institution under section 1003.2(g),
it reports a purchase of the covered loan pursuant to section 1003.4(a),
regardless of whether it acquired the covered loan from Financial
Institution B or directly from Financial Institution A.
Paragraph 4(a)(1)(i) 1. ULI—uniqueness. Section 1003.4(a)(1)(i)(B)(2) requires a financial institution
that assigns a universal loan identifier (ULI) to each covered loan
or application (except as provided in section 1003.4(a)(1)(i)(D) and
(E)) to ensure that the character sequence it assigns is unique within
the institution and used only for the covered loan or application.
A financial institution should assign only one ULI to any particular
covered loan or application, and each ULI should correspond to a single
application and ensuing loan in the case that the application is approved
and a loan is originated. A financial institution may use a ULI that
was reported previously to refer only to the same loan or application
for which the ULI was used previously or a loan that ensues from an
application for which the ULI was used previously. A financial institution
may not report an application for a covered loan in 2030 using the
same ULI that was reported for a covered loan that was originated
in 2020. Similarly, refinancings or applications for refinancing should
be assigned a different ULI than the loan that is being refinanced.
A financial institution with multiple branches must ensure that its
branches do not use the same ULI to refer to multiple covered loans
or applications.
2. ULI—privacy. Section 1003.4(a)(1)(i)(B)(3) prohibits
a financial institution from including information that could be used
to directly identify the applicant or borrower in the identifier that
it assigns for the application or covered loan of the applicant or
borrower. Information that could be used to directly identify the
applicant or borrower includes, but is not limited to, the applicant’s
or borrower’s name, date of birth, Social Security number, official
government-issued driver’s license or identification number,
alien registration number, government passport number, or employer
or taxpayer identification number.
3. ULI—purchased covered loan. If a
financial institution has previously assigned a covered loan with
a ULI or reported a covered loan with a ULI under this part, a financial
institution that purchases that covered loan must report the same
ULI that was previously assigned or reported unless the purchase of
the covered loan is a partially exempt transaction under section 1003.3(d).
For example, if a financial institution that submits an annual loan/application
register pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(i) originates a covered
loan that is purchased by a financial institution that also submits
an annual loan/ application register pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(i),
the financial institution that purchases the covered loan must report
the purchase of the covered loan using the same ULI that was reported
by the originating financial institution if the purchase is not a
partially exempt transaction. If a financial institution that originates
a covered loan has previously assigned the covered loan with a ULI
under this part but has not yet reported the covered loan, a financial
institution that purchases that covered loan must report the same
ULI that was previously assigned if the purchase is not a partially
exempt transaction. For example, if a financial institution that submits
an annual loan/application register pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(i)
(Institution A) originates a covered loan that is purchased by a financial
institution that submits a quarterly loan/application register pursuant
to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii) (Institution B) and Institution A assigned
a ULI to the loan, then unless the purchase is a partially exempt
transaction Institution B must report the ULI that was assigned by
Institution A on Institution B’s quarterly loan/application
register pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii), even though Institution
A has not yet submitted its annual loan/application register pursuant
to section 1003.5(a)(1)(i). A financial institution that purchases
a covered loan and is ineligible for a partial exemption with respect
to the purchased covered loan must assign it a ULI pursuant to section
1003.4(a)(1)(i) and report it pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(i)
or (ii), whichever is applicable, if the covered loan was not assigned
a ULI by the financial institution that originated the loan because,
for example, the loan was originated prior to January 1, 2018, the
loan was originated by an institution not required to report under
this part, or the loan was assigned a non-universal loan identifier
(NULI) under section 1003.3(d)(5) rather than a ULI by the loan originator.
4. ULI—reinstated
or reconsidered application. A financial institution may, at
its option, report a ULI previously reported under this part if, during
the same calendar year, an applicant asks the institution to reinstate
a counteroffer that the applicant previously did not accept or asks
the financial institution to reconsider an application that was previously
denied, withdrawn, or closed for incompleteness. For example, if a
financial institution reports a denied application in its second-quarter
2020 data submission, pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii), but then
reconsiders the application, resulting in an origination in the third
quarter of 2020, the financial institution may report the origination
in its third-quarter 2020 data submission using the same ULI that
was reported for the denied application in its second-quarter 2020
data submission, so long as the financial institution treats the origination
as the same transaction for reporting. However, a financial institution
may not use a ULI previously reported if it reinstates or reconsiders
an application that was reported in a prior calendar year. For example,
if a financial institution reports a denied application that is not
partially exempt in its fourth-quarter 2020 data submission, pursuant
to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii), but then reconsiders the application,
resulting in an origination that is not partially exempt in the first
quarter of 2021, the financial institution reports a denied application
under the original ULI in its fourth-quarter 2020 data submission
and an origination with a different ULI in its first-quarter 2021
data submission, pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii).
5. ULI—check digit. Section 1003.4(a)(1)(i)(C)requires that the two rightmost characters
in the ULI represent the check digit. Appendix C prescribes the requirements
for generating a check digit and validating a ULI.
6. NULI. For a partially exempt transaction
under section 1003.3(d), a financial institution may report a ULI
or a NULI. See section 1003.3(d)(5) and comments 3(d)(5)-1
and -2 for guidance on the NULI.
6-5274
Paragraph 4(a)(1)(ii) 1. Application date—consistency. Section
1003.4(a)(1)(ii) requires that, in reporting the date of application,
a financial institution report the date it received the application,
as defined under section 1003.2(b), or the date shown on the application
form. Although a financial institution need not choose the same approach
for its entire HMDA submission, it should be generally consistent
(such as by routinely using one approach within a particular division
of the institution or for a category of loans). If the financial institution
chooses to report the date shown on the application form and the institution
retains multiple versions of the application form, the institution
reports the date shown on the first application form satisfying the
application definition provided under section 1003.2(b).
2. Application date—indirect
application. For an application that was not submitted directly
to the financial institution, the institution may report the date
the application was received by the party that initially received
the application, the date the application was received by the institution,
or the date shown on the application form. Although an institution
need not choose the same approach for its entire HMDA submission,
it should be generally consistent (such as by routinely using one
approach within a particular division of the institution or for a
category of loans).
3. Application date—reinstated application. If, within the
same calendar year, an applicant asks a financial institution to reinstate
a counteroffer that the applicant previously did not accept (or asks
the institution to reconsider an application that was denied, withdrawn,
or closed for incompleteness), the institution may treat that request
as the continuation of the earlier transaction using the same ULI
or NULI or as a new transaction with a new ULI or NULI. If the institution
treats the request for reinstatement or reconsideration as a new transaction,
it reports the date of the request as the application date. If the
institution does not treat the request for reinstatement or reconsideration
as a new transaction, it reports the original application date.
Paragraph 4(a)(2) 1. Loan type—general. If a covered loan is not, or in the case of an application would
not have been, insured by the Federal Housing Administration, guaranteed
by the Department of Veterans Affairs, or guaranteed by the Rural
Housing Service or the Farm Service Agency, an institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(2) by reporting the covered loan as not insured
or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration, Department of
Veterans Affairs, Rural Housing Service, or Farm Service Agency.
6-5275
Paragraph 4(a)(3) 1. Purpose—statement
of applicant. A financial institution may rely on the oral or
written statement of an applicant regarding the proposed use of covered
loan proceeds. For example, a lender could use a check-box or a purpose
line on a loan application to determine whether the applicant intends
to use covered loan proceeds for home improvement purposes. If an
applicant provides no statement as to the proposed use of covered
loan proceeds and the covered loan is not a home purchase
loan, cash-out refinancing, or refinancing, a financial institution
reports the covered loan as for a purpose other than home purchase,
home improvement, refinancing, or cash-out refinancing for purposes
of section 1003.4(a)(3).
2. Purpose—refinancing and cash-out refinancing. Section
1003.4(a)(3) requires a financial institution to report whether a
covered loan is, or an application is for, a refinancing or a cash-out
refinancing. A financial institution reports a covered loan or an
application as a cash-out refinancing if it is a refinancing as defined
by section 1003.2(p) and the institution considered it to be a cash-out
refinancing in processing the application or setting the terms (such
as the interest rate or origination charges) under its guidelines
or an investor’s guidelines. For example:
i. Assume a financial institution considers
an application for a loan product to be a cash-out refinancing under
an investor’s guidelines because of the amount of cash received
by the borrower at closing or account opening. Assume also that under
the investor’s guidelines, the applicant qualifies for the loan
product and the financial institution approves the application, originates
the covered loan, and sets the terms of the covered loan consistent
with the loan product. In this example, the financial institution
would report the covered loan as a cash-out refinancing for purposes
of section 1003.4(a)(3).
ii. Assume a financial institution does not consider an application
for a covered loan to be a cash-out refinancing under its own guidelines
because the amount of cash received by the borrower does not exceed
a certain threshold. Assume also that the institution approves the
application, originates the covered loan, and sets the terms of the
covered loan consistent with its own guidelines applicable to refinancings
other than cash-out refinancings. In this example, the financial institution
would report the covered loan as a refinancing for purposes of section
1003.4(a)(3).
iii.
Assume a financial institution does not distinguish between a cash-out
refinancing and a refinancing under its own guidelines, and sets the
terms of all refinancings without regard to the amount of cash received
by the borrower at closing or account opening, and does not offer
loan products under investor guidelines. In this example, the financial
institution reports all covered loans and applications for covered
loans that are defined by section 1003.2(p) as refinancings for purposes
of section 1003.4(a)(3).
3. Purpose—multiple-purpose loan. Section
1003.4(a)(3) requires a financial institution to report the purpose
of a covered loan or application. If a covered loan is a home purchase
loan as well as a home improvement loan, a refinancing, or a cash-out
refinancing, an institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(3) by
reporting the loan as a home purchase loan. If a covered loan is a
home improvement loan as well as a refinancing or cash-out refinancing,
but the covered loan is not a home purchase loan, an institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(3) by reporting the covered loan as a refinancing
or a cash-out refinancing, as appropriate. If a covered loan is a
refinancing or cash-out refinancing as well as for another purpose,
such as for the purpose of paying educational expenses, but the covered
loan is not a home purchase loan, an institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(3) by reporting the covered loan as a refinancing or a cash-out
refinancing, as appropriate. See comment 4(a)(3)-2. If a covered
loan is a home improvement loan as well as for another purpose, but
the covered loan is not a home purchase loan, a refinancing, or cash-out
refinancing, an institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(3) by
reporting the covered loan as a home improvement loan. See comment
2(i)-1.
4. Purpose—other. If a covered loan is not, or an application is not for, a home purchase
loan, a home improvement loan, a refinancing, or a cash-out refinancing,
a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(3) by reporting
the covered loan or application as for a purpose other than home purchase,
home improvement, refinancing, or cash-out refinancing. For example,
if a covered loan is for the purpose of paying educational expenses, the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(3) by reporting the covered
loan as for a purpose other than home purchase, home improvement,
refinancing, or cash-out refinancing. Section 1003.4(a)(3) also requires
an institution to report a covered loan or application as for a purpose
other than home purchase, home improvement, refinancing, or cash-out
refinancing if it is a refinancing but, under the terms of the agreement,
the financial institution was unconditionally obligated to refinance
the obligation subject to conditions within the borrower’s control.
5. Purpose—business
or commercial purpose loans. If a covered loan primarily is for
a business or commercial purpose as described in section 1003.3(c)(10)
and comment 3(c)(10)-2 and is a home purchase loan, home improvement
loan, or a refinancing, section 1003.4(a)(3) requires the financial
institution to report the applicable loan purpose. If a loan primarily
is for a business or commercial purpose but is not a home purchase
loan, home improvement loan, or a refinancing, the loan is an excluded
transaction under section 1003.3(c)(10).
6. Purpose—purchased loans. For purchased
covered loans where origination took place prior to January 1, 2018,
a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(3) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable.
Paragraph 4(a)(4) 1. Request under a preapproval
program. Section 1003.4(a)(4) requires a financial institution
to report whether an application or covered loan involved a request
for a preapproval of a home purchase loan under a preapproval program
as defined by section 1003.2(b)(2). If an application or covered loan
did not involve a request for a preapproval of a home purchase loan
under a preapproval program as defined by section 1003.2(b)(2), a
financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(4) by reporting
that the application or covered loan did not involve such a request,
regardless of whether the institution has such a program and the applicant
did not apply through that program or the institution does not have
a preapproval program as defined by section 1003.2(b)(2).
2. Scope of requirement. A financial institution reports that the application or covered
loan did not involve a preapproval request for a purchased covered
loan; an application or covered loan for any purpose other than a
home purchase loan; an application for a home purchase loan or a covered
loan that is a home purchase loan secured by a multifamily dwelling;
an application or covered loan that is an open-end line of credit
or a reverse mortgage; or an application that is denied, withdrawn
by the applicant, or closed for incompleteness.
Paragraph 4(a)(5) 1. Modular homes and prefabricated
components. Covered loans or applications related to modular
homes should be reported with a construction method of site-built,
regardless of whether they are on-frame or off-frame modular homes.
Modular homes comply with local or other recognized buildings codes
rather than standards established by the National Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards Act, 42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq. Modular homes are not required to have HUD Certification Labels
under 24 CFR 3280.11 or data plates under 24 CFR 3280.5. Modular homes
may have a certification from a State licensing agency that documents
compliance with State or other applicable building codes. On-frame
modular homes are constructed on permanent metal chassis similar to
those used in manufactured homes. The chassis are not removed on site
and are secured to the foundation. Off-frame modular homes typically
have floor construction similar to the construction of other site-built
homes, and the construction typically includes wooden floor joists
and does not include permanent metal chassis. Dwellings built using
prefabricated components assembled at the dwelling’s permanent
site should also be reported with a construction method of site-built.
2. Multifamily dwelling. For a covered loan or an application for a covered loan related
to a multifamily dwelling, the financial institution should report the
construction method as site-built unless the multifamily dwelling
is a manufactured home community, in which case the financial institution
should report the construction method as manufactured home.
3. Multiple properties. See comment 4(a)(9)-2 regarding transactions involving multiple
properties with more than one property taken as security.
6-5276
Paragraph 4(a)(6) 1. Multiple properties. See comment 4(a)(9)-2 regarding transactions involving multiple
properties with more than one property taken as security.
2. Principal residence. Section 1003.4(a)(6) requires a financial institution to identify
whether the property to which the covered loan or application relates
is or will be used as a residence that the applicant or borrower physically
occupies and uses, or will occupy and use, as his or her principal
residence. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(6), an applicant or borrower
can have only one principal residence at a time. Thus, a vacation
or other second home would not be a principal residence. However,
if an applicant or borrower buys or builds a new dwelling that will
become the applicant’s or borrower’s principal residence
within a year or upon the completion of construction, the new dwelling
is considered the principal residence for purposes of applying this
definition to a particular transaction.
3. Second residences. Section 1003.4(a)(6)
requires a financial institution to identify whether the property
to which the loan or application relates is or will be used as a second
residence. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(6), a property is a second
residence of an applicant or borrower if the property is or will be
occupied by the applicant or borrower for a portion of the year and
is not the applicant’s or borrower’s principal residence.
For example, if a person purchases a property, occupies the property
for a portion of the year, and rents the property for the remainder
of the year, the property is a second residence for purposes of section
1003.4(a)(6). Similarly, if a couple occupies a property near their
place of employment on weekdays, but the couple returns to their principal
residence on weekends, the property near the couple’s place
of employment is a second residence for purposes of section 1003.4(a)(6).
4. Investment properties. Section 1003.4(a)(6) requires a financial institution to identify
whether the property to which the covered loan or application relates
is or will be used as an investment property. For purposes of section
1003.4(a)(6), a property is an investment property if the borrower
does not, or the applicant will not, occupy the property. For example,
if a person purchases a property, does not occupy the property, and
generates income by renting the property, the property is an investment
property for purposes of section 1003.4(a)(6). Similarly, if a person
purchases a property, does not occupy the property, and does not generate
income by renting the property, but intends to generate income by
selling the property, the property is an investment property for purposes
of section 1003.4(a)(6). Section 1003.4(a)(6) requires a financial
institution to identify a property as an investment property if the
borrower or applicant does not or will not occupy the property, even
if the borrower or applicant does not consider the property as owned
for investment purposes. For example, if a corporation purchases a
property that is a dwelling under section 1003.2(f), that it does
not occupy, but that is for the long-term residential use of its employees,
the property is an investment property for purposes of section 1003.4(a)(6),
even if the corporation considers the property as owned for business
purposes rather than investment purposes, does not generate income
by renting the property, and does not intend to generate income by
selling the property at some point in time. If the property is for
transitory use by employees, the property would not be considered
a dwelling under section 1003.2(f). See comment 2(f)-3.
5. Purchased covered loans. For purchased covered loans, a financial institution may report
principal residence unless the loan documents or application indicate
that the property will not be occupied as a principal residence.
6-5277
Paragraph 4(a)(7) 1. Covered loan amount—counteroffer. If an applicant accepts a counteroffer for an amount different from
the amount for which the applicant applied, the financial institution
reports the covered loan amount granted. If an applicant does not
accept a counteroffer or fails to respond, the institution reports
the amount initially requested.
2. Covered loan amount—application approved
but not accepted or preapproval request approved but not accepted. A financial institution reports the covered loan amount that was
approved.
3. Covered
loan amount—preapproval request denied, application denied,
closed for incompleteness or withdrawn. For a preapproval request
that was denied, and for an application that was denied, closed for
incompleteness, or withdrawn, a financial institution reports the
amount for which the applicant applied.
4. Covered loan amount—multiple-purpose loan. A financial institution reports the entire amount of the covered
loan, even if only a part of the proceeds is intended for home purchase,
home improvement, or refinancing.
5. Covered loan amount—closed-end mortgage
loan. For a closed-end mortgage loan, other than a purchased
loan, an assumption, or a reverse mortgage, a financial institution
reports the amount to be repaid as disclosed on the legal obligation.
For a purchased closed-end mortgage loan or an assumption of a closed-end
mortgage loan, a financial institution reports the unpaid principal
balance at the time of purchase or assumption.
6. Covered loan amount—open-end line
of credit. For an open-end line of credit, a financial institution
reports the entire amount of credit available to the borrower under
the terms of the open-end plan, including a purchased open-end line
of credit and an assumption of an open-end line of credit, but not
for a reverse mortgage open-end line of credit.
7. Covered loan amount—refinancing. For a refinancing, a financial institution reports the amount of
credit extended under the terms of the new debt obligation.
8. Covered loan amount—home
improvement loan. A financial institution reports the entire
amount of a home improvement loan, even if only a part of the proceeds
is intended for home improvement.
9. Covered loan amount—non-federally insured
reverse mortgage. A financial institution reports the initial
principal limit of a non-federally insured reverse mortgage as set
forth in section 1003.4(a)(7)(iii).
6-5278
Paragraph 4(a)(8)(i) 1. Action taken—covered loan originated. A financial institution reports that the covered loan was originated
if the financial institution made a credit decision approving the
application before closing or account opening and that credit decision
results in an extension of credit. The same is true for an application
that began as a request for a preapproval that subsequently results
in a covered loan being originated. See comments 4(a)-2 through
-4 for guidance on transactions in which more than one institution
is involved.
2. Action
taken—covered loan purchased. A financial institution reports
that the covered loan was purchased if the covered loan was purchased
by the financial institution after closing or account opening and
the financial institution did not make a credit decision on the application
prior to closing or account opening, or if the financial institution
did make a credit decision on the application prior to closing or
account opening, but is repurchasing the loan from another entity
that the loan was sold to. See comment 4(a)-5. See comments
4(a)-2 through -4 for guidance on transactions in which more than
one financial institution is involved.
3. Action taken—application approved but
not accepted. A financial institution reports application approved
but not accepted if the financial institution made a credit decision
approving the application before closing or account opening, subject
solely to outstanding conditions that are customary commitment or
closing conditions, but the applicant or the party that initially
received the application fails to respond to the financial institution’s
approval within the specified time, or the closed-end mortgage loan
was not otherwise consummated or the account was not otherwise opened. See comment 4(a)(8)(i)-13.
4. Action taken—application denied. A
financial institution reports that the application was denied if it
made a credit decision denying the application before an applicant
withdraws the application or the file is closed for incompleteness. See comments 4(a)-2 through -4 for guidance on transactions
in which more than one institution is involved.
5. Action taken—application withdrawn. A financial institution reports that the application was withdrawn
when the application is expressly withdrawn by the applicant before
the financial institution makes a credit decision denying the application,
before the financial institution makes a credit decision approving
the application, or before the file is closed for incompleteness.
A financial institution also reports application withdrawn if the
financial institution provides a conditional approval specifying underwriting
or creditworthiness conditions, pursuant to comment 4(a)(8)(i)-13,
and the application is expressly withdrawn by the applicant before
the applicant satisfies all specified underwriting or creditworthiness
conditions. A preapproval request that is withdrawn is not reportable
under HMDA. See section 1003.4(a).
6. Action taken—file closed for incompleteness. A financial institution reports that the file was closed for incompleteness
if the financial institution sent a written notice of incompleteness
under Regulation B, 12 CFR 1002.9(c)(2), and the applicant did not
respond to the request for additional information within the period
of time specified in the notice before the applicant satisfies all
underwriting or creditworthiness conditions. See comment 4(a)(8)(i)-13.
If a financial institution then provides a notification of adverse
action on the basis of incompleteness under Regulation B, 12 CFR 1002.9(c)(1)(i),
the financial institution may report the action taken as either file
closed for incompleteness or application denied. A preapproval request
that is closed for incompleteness is not reportable under HMDA. See section 1003.4(a) and comment 4(a)-1.ii.
7. Action taken—preapproval request
denied. A financial institution reports that the preapproval
request was denied if the application was a request for a preapproval
under a preapproval program as defined in section 1003.2(b)(2) and
the institution made a credit decision denying the preapproval request.
8. Action taken—preapproval
request approved but not accepted. A financial institution reports
that the preapproval request was approved but not accepted if the
application was a request for a preapproval under a preapproval program
as defined in section 1003.2(b)(2) and the institution made a credit
decision approving the preapproval request but the application did
not result in a covered loan originated by the financial institution.
9. Action taken—counteroffers. If a financial institution makes a counteroffer to lend on terms
different from the applicant’s initial request (for example,
for a shorter loan maturity, with a different interest rate, or in
a different amount) and the applicant declines to proceed with the
counteroffer or fails to respond, the institution reports the action
taken as a denial on the original terms requested by the applicant.
If the applicant agrees to proceed with consideration of the financial
institution’s counteroffer, the financial institution reports
the action taken as the disposition of the application based on the
terms of the counteroffer. For example, assume a financial institution
makes a counteroffer, the applicant agrees to proceed with the terms
of the counteroffer, and the financial institution then makes a credit
decision approving the application conditional on satisfying
underwriting or creditworthiness conditions, and the applicant expressly
withdraws before satisfying all underwriting or creditworthiness conditions
and before the institution denies the application or closes the file
for incompleteness. The financial institution reports the action taken
as application withdrawn in accordance with comment 4(a)(8)(i)-13.i.
Similarly, assume a financial institution makes a counteroffer, the
applicant agrees to proceed with consideration of the counteroffer,
and the financial institution provides a conditional approval stating
the conditions to be met to originate the counteroffer. The financial
institution reports the action taken on the application in accordance
with comment 4(a)(8)(i)-13 regarding conditional approvals.
10. Action taken—rescinded
transactions. If a borrower rescinds a transaction after closing
and before a financial institution is required to submit its loan/application
register containing the information for the transaction under section
1003.5(a), the institution reports the transaction as an application
that was approved but not accepted.
11. Action taken—purchased covered loans. An institution reports the covered loans that it purchased during
the calendar year. An institution does not report the covered loans
that it declined to purchase, unless, as discussed in comments 4(a)-2
through -4, the institution reviewed the application prior to closing,
in which case it reports the application or covered loan according
to comments 4(a)-2 through -4.
12. Action taken—repurchased covered loans. See comment 4(a)-5 regarding reporting requirements when
a covered loan is repurchased by the originating financial institution.
13. Action taken—conditional
approvals. If an institution issues an approval other than a
commitment pursuant to a preapproval program as defined under section
1003.2(b)(2), and that approval is subject to the applicant meeting
certain conditions, the institution reports the action taken as provided
below dependent on whether the conditions are solely customary commitment
or closing conditions or if the conditions include any underwriting
or creditworthiness conditions.
i. Action taken
examples. If the approval is conditioned on satisfying underwriting
or creditworthiness conditions and they are not met, the institution
reports the action taken as a denial. If, however, the conditions
involve submitting additional information about underwriting or creditworthiness
that the institution needs to make the credit decision, and the institution
has sent a written notice of incompleteness under Regulation B, 12
CFR 1002.9(c)(2), and the applicant did not respond within the period
of time specified in the notice, the institution reports the action
taken as file closed for incompleteness. See comment 4(a)(8)(i)-6.
If the conditions are solely customary commitment or closing conditions
and the conditions are not met, the institution reports the action
taken as approved but not accepted. If all the conditions (underwriting,
creditworthiness, or customary commitment or closing conditions) are
satisfied and the institution agrees to extend credit but the covered
loan is not originated, the institution reports the action taken as
application approved but not accepted. If the applicant expressly
withdraws before satisfying all underwriting or creditworthiness conditions
and before the institution denies the application or closes the file
for incompleteness, the institution reports the action taken as application
withdrawn. If all underwriting and creditworthiness conditions have
been met, and the outstanding conditions are solely customary commitment
or closing conditions and the applicant expressly withdraws before
the covered loan is originated, the institution reports the action
taken as application approved but not accepted.
ii. Customary
commitment or closing conditions. Customary commitment or closing
conditions include, for example: A clear-title requirement, an acceptable
property survey, acceptable title insurance binder, clear termite
inspection, a subordination agreement from another lienholder, and,
where the applicant plans to use the proceeds from the sale of one
home to pur chase another, a settlement statement showing adequate proceeds
from the sale.
iii. Underwriting or creditworthiness conditions. Underwriting or creditworthiness conditions include, for example:
Conditions that constitute a counter-offer, such as a demand for a
higher down-payment; satisfactory debt-to-income or loan-to-value
ratios, a determination of need for private mortgage insurance, or
a satisfactory appraisal requirement; or verification or confirmation,
in whatever form the institution requires, that the applicant meets
underwriting conditions concerning applicant creditworthiness, including
documentation or verification of income or assets.
14. Action taken—pending
applications. An institution does not report any covered loan
application still pending at the end of the calendar year; it reports
that application on its loan/application register for the year in
which final action is taken.
Paragraph 4(a)(8)(ii) 1. Action taken date—general. A financial
institution reports the date of the action taken.
2. Action taken date—applications
denied and files closed for incompleteness. For applications,
including requests for a preapproval, that are denied or for files
closed for incompleteness, the financial institution reports either
the date the action was taken or the date the notice was sent to the
applicant.
3. Action
taken date—application withdrawn. For applications withdrawn,
the financial institution may report the date the express withdrawal
was received or the date shown on the notification form in the case
of a written withdrawal.
6-5279
4. Action taken date—approved but not accepted. For a covered loan approved by an institution but not accepted by
the applicant, the institution reports any reasonable date, such as
the approval date, the deadline for accepting the offer, or the date
the file was closed. Although an institution need not choose the same
approach for its entire HMDA submission, it should be generally consistent
(such as by routinely using one approach within a particular division
of the institution or for a category of covered loans).
5. Action taken date—originations. For covered loan originations, including a preapproval request that
leads to an origination by the financial institution, an institution
generally reports the closing or account opening date. For covered
loan originations that an institution acquires from a party that initially
received the application, the institution reports either the closing
or account opening date, or the date the institution acquired the
covered loan from the party that initially received the application.
If the disbursement of funds takes place on a date later than the
closing or account opening date, the institution may use the date
of initial disbursement. For a construction/permanent covered loan,
the institution reports either the closing or account opening date,
or the date the covered loan converts to the permanent financing.
Although an institution need not choose the same approach for its
entire HMDA submission, it should be generally consistent (such as
by routinely using one approach within a particular division of the
institution or for a category of covered loans). Notwithstanding this
flexibility regarding the use of the closing or account opening date
in connection with reporting the date action was taken, the institution
must report the origination as occurring in the year in which the
origination goes to closing or the account is opened.
6. Action taken date—loan
purchased. For covered loans purchased, a financial institution
reports the date of purchase.
6-5280
Paragraph 4(a)(9) 1. Multiple properties with one property taken
as security. If a covered loan is related to more than one property,
but only one property is taken as security (or, in the case of an
application, proposed to be taken as security), a financial institution
reports the information required by section 1003.4(a)(9) for the property
taken as or proposed to be taken as security. A financial institution
does not report the information required by section 1003.4(a)(9) for
the property or properties related to the loan that are not taken
as or proposed to be taken as security. For example, if a covered
loan is secured by property A, and the proceeds are used to purchase
or rehabilitate (or to refinance home purchase or home improvement
loans related to) property B, the institution reports the information
required by section 1003.4(a)(9) for property A and does not report
the information required by section 1003.4(a)(9) for property B.
2. Multiple properties
with more than one property taken as security. If more than one
property is taken or, in the case of an application, proposed to be
taken as security for a single covered loan, a financial institution
reports the covered loan or application in a single entry on its loan/application
register and provides the information required by section 1003.4(a)(9)
for one of the properties taken as security that contains a dwelling.
A financial institution does not report information about the other
properties taken as security. If an institution is required to report
specific information about the property identified in section 1003.4(a)(9),
the institution reports the information that relates to the property
identified in section 1003.4(a)(9) (or, if the transaction is partially
exempt under section 1003.3(d) and no data are reported pursuant to
section 1003.4(a)(9), the property that the institution would have
identified in section 1003.4(a)(9) if the transaction were not partially
exempt). For example, Financial Institution A originated a covered
loan that is secured by both property A and property B, each of which
contains a dwelling. Financial Institution A reports the loan as one
entry on its loan/application register, reporting the information
required by section 1003.4(a)(9) for either property A or property
B. If Financial Institution A elects to report the information required
by section 1003.4(a)(9) about property A, Financial Institution A
also reports the information required by section 1003.4(a)(5), (6),
(14), (29), and (30) related to property A. For aspects of the entries
that do not refer to the property identified in section 1003.4(a)(9)
(i.e., section 1003.4(a)(1) through (4), (7), (8), (10) through (13),
(15) through (28), and (31) through (38)), Financial Institution A
reports the information applicable to the covered loan or application
and not information that relates only to the property identified in
section 1003.4(a)(9).
3. Multifamily dwellings. A single multifamily dwelling may have
more than one postal address. For example, three apartment buildings,
each with a different street address, comprise a single multifamily
dwelling that secures a covered loan. For the purposes of section
1003.4(a)(9), a financial institution reports the information required
by section 1003.4(a)(9) in the same manner described in comment 4(a)(9)-2.
4. Loans purchased from
another institution. The requirement to report the property location
information required by section 1003.4(a)(9) applies not only to applications
and originations but also to purchased covered loans.
5. Manufactured home. If
the site of a manufactured home has not been identified, a financial
institution complies by reporting that the information required by
section 1003.4(a)(9) is not applicable.
Paragraph 4(a)(9)(i) 1. General. Except for
partially exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(9)(i)
requires a financial institution to report the property address of
the location of the property securing a covered loan or, in the case
of an application, proposed to secure a covered loan. The address
should correspond to the property identified on the legal obligation
related to the covered loan. For applications that did not result
in an origination, the address should correspond to the location of
the property proposed to secure the loan as identified by the applicant.
For example, assume a loan is secured by a property located at 123
Main Street, and the applicant’s or borrower’s mailing
address is a post office box. The financial institution should not
report the post office box, and should report 123 Main Street.
2. Property address—format. A financial institution complies with the requirements in section
1003.4(a)(9)(i) by reporting the following information about the physical
location of the property securing the loan.
i. Street address. When reporting the street address of the property, a financial institution
complies by including, as applicable, the primary address number,
the predirectional, the street name, street prefixes and/or suffixes,
the postdirectional, the secondary address identifier, and the secondary
address, as applicable. For example, 100 N Main ST Apt 1.
ii. City name. A financial institution complies by reporting the
name of the city in which the property is located.
iii. State name. A financial institution complies by reporting the two letter State
code for the State in which the property is located, using the U.S.
Postal Service official State abbreviations.
iv. Zip Code. A financial institution complies by reporting the five or nine digit
Zip Code in which the property is located.
3. Property address—not applicable. A financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(9)(i) by
reporting that the requirement is not applicable if the property address
of the property securing the covered loan is not known. For example,
if the property did not have a property address at closing or if the
applicant did not provide the property address of the property to
the financial institution before the application was denied, withdrawn,
or closed for incompleteness, the financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(9)(i) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable.
Paragraph 4(a)(9)(ii) 1. Optional reporting. Section 1003.4(a)(9)(ii) requires a financial institution to report
the State, county, and census tract of the property securing the covered
loan or, in the case of an application, proposed to secure the covered
loan if the property is located in an MSA or MD in which the financial
institution has a home or branch office or if the institution is subject
to section 1003.4(e). Section 1003.4(a)(9)(ii)(C) further limits the
requirement to report census tract to covered loans secured by or
applications proposed to be secured by properties located in counties
with a population of more than 30,000 according to the most recent
decennial census conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. For transactions
for which State, county, or census tract reporting is not required
under section 1003.4(a)(9)(ii) or (e), financial institutions may
report that the requirement is not applicable, or they may voluntarily
report the State, county, or census tract information.
Paragraph 4(a)(9)(ii)(A) 1. Applications—state
not provided. When reporting an application, a financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(9)(ii)(A) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable if the State in which the property is located was
not known before the application was denied, withdrawn, or closed
for incompleteness.
Paragraph
4(a)(9)(ii)(B) 1. General. A financial institution complies
by reporting the five-digit Federal Information Processing Standards
(FIPS) numerical county code.
2. Applications—county not provided. When reporting an application, a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(9)(ii)(B) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable if the county in which the property is located was
not known before the application was denied, withdrawn, or closed
for incompleteness.
Paragraph
4(a)(9)(ii)(C) 1. General. Census tract numbers are defined
by the U.S. Census Bureau. A financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(9)(ii)(C) if it uses the boundaries and codes in effect
on January 1 of the calendar year covered by the loan/application
register that it is reporting.
2. Applications—census tract not provided. When reporting an application, a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(9)(ii)(C) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable if the census tract in which the property is located
was not known before the application was denied, withdrawn, or closed
for incompleteness.
6-5282
Paragraph 4(a)(10)(i) 1. Applicant
data—general. Refer to appendix B to this part for instructions
on collection of an applicant’s ethnicity, race, and sex.
2. Transition rule for
applicant data collected prior to January 1, 2018. If a financial
institution receives an application prior to January 1, 2018, but
final action is taken on or after January 1, 2018, the financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(10)(i) and (b) if it collects the
information in accordance with the requirements in effect at the time
the information was collected. For example, if a financial institution
receives an application on November 15, 2017, collects the applicant’s
ethnicity, race, and sex in accordance with the instructions in effect
on that date, and takes final action on the application on January
5, 2018, the financial institution has complied with the requirements
of section 1003.4(a)(10)(i) and (b), even though those instructions
changed after the information was collected but before the date of
final action. However, if, in this example, the financial institution
collected the applicant’s ethnicity, race, and sex on or after
January 1, 2018, section 1003.4(a)(10)(i) and (b) requires the financial
institution to collect the information in accordance with the amended
instructions.
Paragraph 4(a)(10)(ii) 1. Applicant
data—completion by financial institution. A financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(10)(ii) by reporting the applicant’s
age, as of the application date under section 1003.4(a)(1)(ii), as
the number of whole years derived from the date of birth as shown
on the application form. For example, if an applicant provides a date
of birth of 01/15/1970 on the application form that the financial
institution receives on 01/14/2015, the institution reports 44 as
the applicant’s age.
2. Applicant data—co-applicant. If there
are no co-applicants, the financial institution reports that there
is no co-applicant. If there is more than one co-applicant, the financial
institution reports the age only for the first co-applicant listed
on the application form. A co-applicant may provide an absent co-applicant’s
age on behalf of the absent co-applicant.
3. Applicant data—purchased loan. A
financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(10)(ii) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable when reporting a purchased
loan for which the institution chooses not to report the age.
4. Applicant data—non-natural
person. A financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(10)(ii)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable if the applicant
or co-applicant is not a natural person (for example, a corporation,
partnership, or trust). For example, for a transaction involving a
trust, a financial institution reports that the requirement to report
the applicant’s age is not applicable if the trust is the applicant.
On the other hand, if the applicant is a natural person, and is the
beneficiary of a trust, a financial institution reports the applicant’s
age.
5. Applicant data—guarantor. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(10)(ii), if a covered loan or
application includes a guarantor, a financial institution does not
report the guarantor’s age.
6-5283
Paragraph 4(a)(10)(iii) 1. Income data—income relied on. When
a financial institution evaluates income as part of a credit decision,
it reports the gross annual income relied on in making the credit
decision. For example, if an institution relies on an applicant’s
salary to compute a debt-to-income ratio but also relies on the applicant’s
annual bonus to evaluate creditworthiness, the institution
reports the salary and the bonus to the extent relied upon. If an
institution relies on only a portion of an applicant’s income
in its determination, it does not report that portion of income not
relied on. For example, if an institution, pursuant to lender and
investor guidelines, does not rely on an applicant’s commission
income because it has been earned for less than 12 months, the institution
does not include the applicant’s commission income in the income
reported. Likewise, if an institution relies on the verified gross
income of the applicant in making the credit decision, then the institution
reports the verified gross income. Similarly, if an institution relies
on the income of a cosigner to evaluate creditworthiness, the institution
includes the cosigner’s income to the extent relied upon. An
institution, however, does not include the income of a guarantor who
is only secondarily liable.
2. Income data—co-applicant. If two
persons jointly apply for a covered loan and both list income on the
application, but the financial institution relies on the income of
only one applicant in evaluating creditworthiness, the institution
reports only the income relied on.
3. Income data—loan to employee. A financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(10)(iii) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable for a covered loan to, or an
application from, its employee to protect the employee’s privacy,
even though the institution relied on the employee’s income
in making the credit decision.
4. Income data—assets. A financial institution
does not include as income amounts considered in making a credit decision
based on factors that an institution relies on in addition to income,
such as amounts derived from underwriting calculations of the potential
annuitization or depletion of an applicant’s remaining assets.
Actual distributions from retirement accounts or other assets that
are relied on by the financial institution as income should be reported
as income. The interpretation of income in this paragraph does not
affect section 1003.4(a)(23), which requires, except for purchased
covered loans, the collection of the ratio of the applicant’s
or borrower’s total monthly debt to the total monthly income
relied on in making the credit decision.
5. Income data—credit decision not made. Section 1003.4(a)(10)(iii) requires a financial institution to report
the gross annual income relied on in processing the application if
a credit decision was not made. For example, assume an institution
received an application that included an applicant’s self-reported
income, but the application was withdrawn before a credit decision
that would have considered income was made. The financial institution
reports the income information relied on in processing the application
at the time that the application was withdrawn or the file was closed
for incompleteness.
6. Income data—credit decision not requiring consideration of
income. A financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(10)(iii)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable if the application
did not or would not have required a credit decision that considered
income under the financial institution’s policies and procedures.
For example, if the financial institution’s policies and procedures
do not consider income for a streamlined refinance program, the institution
reports that the requirement is not applicable, even if the institution
received income information from the applicant.
7. Income data—non-natural person. A financial institution reports that the requirement is not applicable
when the applicant or co-applicant is not a natural person (e.g.,
a corporation, partnership, or trust). For example, for a transaction
involving a trust, a financial institution reports that the requirement
to report income data is not applicable if the trust is the applicant.
On the other hand, if the applicant is a natural person, and is the
beneficiary of a trust, a financial institution is required to report
the information described in section 1003.4(a)(10)(iii).
8. Income data—multifamily
properties. A financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(10)(iii)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable when the covered
loan is secured by, or application is proposed to be secured by, a
multifamily dwelling.
9. Income data—purchased loans. A financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(10)(iii) by reporting that the requirement is not
applicable when reporting a purchased covered loan for which the institution
chooses not to report the income.
10. Income data—rounding. A financial
institution complies by reporting the dollar amount of the income
in thousands, rounded to the nearest thousand ($500 rounds up to the
next $1,000). For example, $35,500 is reported as 36.
6-5284
Paragraph 4(a)(11) 1. Type of purchaser—loan-participation
interests sold to more than one entity. A financial institution
that originates a covered loan, and then sells it to more than one
entity, reports the “type of purchaser” based on the entity
purchasing the greatest interest, if any. For purposes of section
1003.4(a)(11), if a financial institution sells some interest or interests
in a covered loan but retains a majority interest in that loan, it
does not report the sale.
2. Type of purchaser—swapped covered loans. Covered loans “swapped” for mortgage-backed securities
are to be treated as sales; the purchaser is the entity receiving
the covered loans that are swapped.
3. Type of purchaser—affiliate institution. For purposes of complying with section 1003.4(a)(11), the term “affiliate”
means any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, another company, as set forth in the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.).
4. Type of purchaser—private securitizations. A financial institution that knows or reasonably believes that the
covered loan it is selling will be securitized by the entity purchasing
the covered loan, other than by one of the government-sponsored enterprises,
reports the purchasing entity type as a private securitizer regardless
of the type or affiliation of the purchasing entity. Knowledge or
reasonable belief could, for example, be based on the purchase agreement
or other related documents, the financial institution’s previous
transactions with the purchaser, or the purchaser’s role as
a securitizer (such as an investment bank). If a financial institution
selling a covered loan does not know or reasonably believe that the
purchaser will securitize the loan, and the seller knows that the
purchaser frequently holds or disposes of loans by means other than
securitization, then the financial institution should report the covered
loan as purchased by, as appropriate, a commercial bank, savings bank,
savings association, life insurance company, credit union, mortgage
company, finance company, affiliate institution, or other type of
purchaser.
5. Type of
purchaser—mortgage company. For purposes of complying with
section 1003.4(a)(11), a mortgage company means a nondepository institution
that purchases covered loans and typically originates such loans.
A mortgage company might be an affiliate or a subsidiary of a bank
holding company or thrift holding company, or it might be an independent
mortgage company. Regardless, a financial institution reports the
purchasing entity type as a mortgage company, unless the mortgage
company is an affiliate of the seller institution, in which case the
seller institution should report the loan as purchased by an affiliate
institution.
6. Purchases
by subsidiaries. A financial institution that sells a covered
loan to its subsidiary that is a commercial bank, savings bank, or
savings association, should report the covered loan as purchased by
a commercial bank, savings bank, or savings association. A financial
institution that sells a covered loan to its subsidiary that is a
life insurance company, should report the covered loan as purchased
by a life insurance company. A financial institution that sells a
covered loan to its subsidiary that is a credit union, mortgage company,
or finance company, should report the covered loan as purchased by
a credit union, mortgage company, or finance company. If the subsidiary
that purchases the covered loan is not a commercial bank, savings
bank, savings association, life insurance company, credit union, mortgage
company, or finance company, the seller institution should report
the loan as pur chased by other type of purchaser. The financial
institution should report the covered loan as purchased by an affiliate
institution when the subsidiary is an affiliate of the seller institution.
7. Type of purchaser—bank
holding company or thrift holding company. When a financial institution
sells a covered loan to a bank holding company or thrift holding company
(rather than to one of its subsidiaries), it should report the loan
as purchased by other type of purchaser, unless the bank holding company
or thrift holding company is an affiliate of the seller institution,
in which case the seller institution should report the loan as purchased
by an affiliate institution.
8. Repurchased covered loans. See comment
4(a)-5 regarding reporting requirements when a covered loan is repurchased
by the originating financial institution.
9. Type of purchaser—quarterly recording. For purposes of recording the type of purchaser within 30 calendar
days after the end of the calendar quarter pursuant to section 1003.4(f),
a financial institution records that the requirement is not applicable
if the institution originated or purchased a covered loan and did
not sell it during the calendar quarter for which the institution
is recording the data. If the financial institution sells the covered
loan in a subsequent quarter of the same calendar year, the financial
institution records the type of purchaser on its loan/application
register for the quarter in which the covered loan was sold. If a
financial institution sells the covered loan in a succeeding year,
the financial institution should not record the sale.
10. Type of purchaser—not
applicable. A financial institution reports that the requirement
is not applicable for applications that were denied, withdrawn, closed
for incompleteness or approved but not accepted by the applicant;
and for preapproval requests that were denied or approved but not
accepted by the applicant. A financial institution also reports that
the requirement is not applicable if the institution originated or
purchased a covered loan and did not sell it during that same calendar
year.
6-5284.1
Paragraph 4(a)(12) 1. Average prime offer
rate. Average prime offer rates are annual percentage rates derived
from average interest rates and other loan pricing terms offered to
borrowers by a set of creditors for mortgage loans that have low-risk
pricing characteristics. Other loan pricing terms may include commonly
used indices, margins, and initial fixed-rate periods for variable-rate
transactions. Relevant pricing characteristics may include a consumer’s
credit history and transaction characteristics such as the loan-to-value
ratio, owner-occupant status, and purpose of the transaction. To obtain
average prime offer rates, the Bureau uses creditor data by transaction
type.
2. Bureau tables. The Bureau publishes tables of current and historic average prime
offer rates by transaction type on the FFIEC’s website (http://www.ffiec.gov/hmda)
and the Bureau’s website (https://www.consumerfinance.gov).
The Bureau calculates an annual percentage rate, consistent with Regulation
Z (see 12 CFR 1026.22 and 12 CFR part 1026, appendix J), for
each transaction type for which pricing terms are available from the
creditor data described in comment 4(a)(12)-1. The Bureau uses loan
pricing terms available in the creditor data and other information
to estimate annual percentage rates for other types of transactions
for which the creditor data are limited or not available. The Bureau
publishes on the FFIEC’s website and the Bureau’s website
the methodology it uses to arrive at these estimates. A financial
institution may either use the average prime offer rates published
by the Bureau or determine average prime offer rates itself by employing
the methodology published on the FFIEC’s website and the Bureau’s
website. A financial institution that determines average prime offer
rates itself, however, is responsible for correctly determining the
rates in accordance with the published methodology.
3. Rate spread calculation—annual
percentage rate. The requirements of section 1003.4(a)(12)(i)
refer to the covered loan’s annual percentage rate. For closed-end
mortgage loans, a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(12)(i)
by relying on the annual percentage rate for the covered loan, as
calculated and disclosed pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.18
or 1026.38. For open-end lines of credit, a financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(12)(i) by relying on the annual percentage
rate for the covered loan, as calculated and disclosed pursuant to
Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.6. If multiple annual percentage rates are
calculated and disclosed pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.6,
a financial institution relies on the annual percentage rate in effect
at the time of account opening. If an open-end line of credit has
a variable-rate feature and a fixed-rate and -term payment option
during the draw period, a financial institution relies on the annual
percentage rate in effect at the time of account opening under the
variable-rate feature, which would be a discounted initial rate if
one is offered under the variable-rate feature. See comment
4(a)(12)-8 for guidance regarding the annual percentage rate a financial
institution relies on in the case of an application or preapproval
request that was approved but not accepted.
4. Rate spread calculation—comparable transaction. The rate spread calculation in section 1003.4(a)(12)(i) is defined
by reference to a comparable transaction, which is determined according
to the covered loan’s amortization type (i.e., fixed- or variable-rate)
and loan term. For covered loans that are open-end lines of credit,
section 1003.4(a)(12)(i) requires a financial institution to identify
the most closely comparable closed-end transaction. The tables of
average prime offer rates published by the Bureau (see comment
4(a)(12)-2) provide additional detail about how to identify the comparable
transaction.
i. Fixed-rate transactions. For fixed-rate covered loans, the term
for identifying the comparable transaction is the transaction’s
maturity (i.e., the period until the last payment will be due under
the closed-end mortgage loan contract or open-end line of credit agreement).
If an open-end credit plan has a fixed rate but no definite plan length,
a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(12)(i) by
using a 30-year fixed-rate loan as the most closely comparable closed-end
transaction. Financial institutions may refer to the table on the
FFIEC website entitled “Average Prime Offer Rates-Fixed”
when identifying a comparable fixed-rate transaction.
ii. Variable-rate transactions. For variable-rate covered loans,
the term for identifying the comparable transaction is the initial,
fixed-rate period (i.e., the period until the first scheduled rate
adjustment). For example, five years is the relevant term for a variable-rate
transaction with a five-year, fixed-rate introductory period that
is amortized over thirty years. Financial institutions may refer to
the table on the FFIEC website entitled “Average Prime Offer
Rates-Variable” when identifying a comparable variable-rate
transaction. If an open-end line of credit has a variable rate and
an optional, fixed-rate feature, a financial institution uses the
rate table for variable-rate transactions.
iii. Term not
in whole years. When a covered loan’s term to maturity
(or, for a variable-rate transaction, the initial fixed-rate period)
is not in whole years, the financial institution uses the number of
whole years closest to the actual loan term or, if the actual loan
term is exactly halfway between two whole years, by using the shorter
loan term. For example, for a loan term of ten years and three months,
the relevant term is ten years; for a loan term of ten years and nine
months, the relevant term is 11 years; for a loan term of ten years
and six months, the relevant term is ten years. If a loan term includes
an odd number of days, in addition to an odd number of months, the
financial institution rounds to the nearest whole month, or rounds
down if the number of odd days is exactly halfway between two months.
The financial institution rounds to one year any covered loan with
a term shorter than six months, including variable-rate covered loans
with no initial, fixed-rate periods. For example, if an open-end covered
loan has a rate that varies according to an index plus a margin, with
no introductory, fixed-rate period, the transaction term is one year.
iv. Amortization period longer than loan term. If the amortization period of a covered loan is longer than the
term of the transaction to maturity, section 1003.4(a)(12)(i) requires
a financial institution to use the loan term to determine the applicable
average prime offer rate. For example, assume a financial institution
originates a closed-end, fixed-rate loan that has a term to maturity
of five years and a thirty-year amortization period that results in
a balloon payment. The financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(12)(i) by using the five-year loan term.
5. Rate-set date. The
relevant date to use to determine the average prime offer rate for
a comparable transaction is the date on which the interest rate was
set by the financial institution for the final time before final action
is taken (i.e., the application was approved but not accepted or the
covered loan was originated).
i. Rate-lock
agreement. If an interest rate is set pursuant to a “lock-in”
agreement between the financial institution and the borrower, then
the date on which the agreement fixes the interest rate is the date
the rate was set. Except as provided in comment 4(a)(12)-5.ii, if
a rate is reset after a lock-in agreement is executed (for example,
because the borrower exercises a float-down option or the agreement
expires), then the relevant date is the date the financial institution
exercises discretion in setting the rate for the final time before
final action is taken. The same rule applies when a rate-lock agreement
is extended and the rate is reset at the same rate, regardless of
whether market rates have increased, decreased, or remained the same
since the initial rate was set. If no lock-in agreement is executed,
then the relevant date is the date on which the institution sets the
rate for the final time before final action is taken.
ii. Change in
loan program. If a financial institution issues a rate-lock commitment
under one loan program, the borrower subsequently changes to another
program that is subject to different pricing terms, and the financial
institution changes the rate promised to the borrower under the rate-lock
commitment accordingly, the rate-set date is the date of the program
change. However, if the financial institution changes the promised
rate to the rate that would have been available to the borrower under
the new program on the date of the original rate-lock commitment,
then that is the date the rate is set, provided the financial institution
consistently follows that practice in all such cases or the original
rate-lock agreement so provided. For example, assume that a borrower
locks a rate of 2.5 percent on June 1 for a 30-year, variable-rate
loan with a five-year, fixed-rate introductory period. On June 15,
the borrower decides to switch to a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, and
the rate available to the borrower for that product on June 15 is
4.0 percent. On June 1, the 30-year, fixed-rate loan would have been
available to the borrower at a rate of 3.5 percent. If the financial
institution offers the borrower the 3.5 percent rate (i.e., the rate
that would have been available to the borrower for the fixed-rate
product on June 1, the date of the original rate-lock) because the
original agreement so provided or because the financial institution
consistently follows that practice for borrowers who change loan programs,
then the financial institution should use June 1 as the rate-set date.
In all other cases, the financial institution should use June 15 as
the rate-set date.
iii. Brokered loans. When a financial
institution has reporting responsibility for an application for a
covered loan that it received from a broker, as discussed in comment
4(a)-2 (e.g., because the financial institution makes a credit decision
prior to closing or account opening), the rate-set date is the last
date the financial institution set the rate with the broker, not the
date the broker set the borrower’s rate.
6. Compare the annual percentage
rate to the average prime offer rate. Section 1003.4(a)(12)(i)
requires a financial institution to compare the covered loan’s
annual percentage rate to the most recently available average prime
offer rate that was in effect for the comparable transaction as of
the rate-set date. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(12)(i), the most
recently available rate means the average prime offer rate set forth
in the applicable table with the most recent effective date as of
the date the interest rate was set. However, section 1003.4(a)(12)(i)
does not permit a financial institution to use an average prime offer
rate before its effective date.
7. Rate spread—scope of requirement. If the covered loan is an assumption, reverse mortgage, a purchased
loan, or is not subject to Regulation Z, 12 CFR part 1026, a financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(12) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable. If the application did not result
in an origination for a reason other than the application was approved
but not accepted by the applicant, a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(12) by reporting that the requirement is not
applicable. For partially exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d),
an insured depository institution or insured credit union is not required
to report the rate spread. See section 1003.3(d) and related
commentary.
8. Application
or preapproval request approved but not accepted. In the case
of an application or preapproval request that was approved but not
accepted, section 1003.4(a)(12) requires a financial institution to
report the applicable rate spread. In such cases, the financial institution
would provide early disclosures under Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.18
or 1026.37 (for closed-end mortgage loans), or 1026.40 (for open-end
lines of credit), but might never provide any subsequent disclosures.
In such cases where no subsequent disclosures are provided, a financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(12)(i) by relying on the
annual percentage rate for the application or preapproval request,
as calculated and disclosed pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.18
or 1026.37 (for closed-end mortgage loans), or 1026.40 (for open-end
lines of credit), as applicable. For transactions subject to Regulation
C for which no disclosures under Regulation Z are required, a financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(12)(i) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable.
9. Corrected disclosures. In the case of a
covered loan or an application that was approved but not accepted,
if the annual percentage rate changes because a financial institution
provides a corrected version of the disclosures required under Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(a), pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(a)(2), under 12 CFR
1026.19(f), pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2), or under 12 CFR 1026.6(a),
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(12)(i) by
comparing the corrected and disclosed annual percentage rate to the
most recently available average prime offer rate that was in effect
for a comparable transaction as of the rate-set date, provided that
the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior to the
end of the reporting period in which final action is taken. For purposes
of section 1003.4(a)(12), the date the corrected disclosure was provided
to the borrower is the date the disclosure was mailed or delivered
to the borrower in person; the financial institution’s method
of delivery does not affect the date provided. For example, where
a financial institution provides a corrected version of the disclosures
required under 12 CFR 1026.19(f), pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2),
the date provided is the date disclosed pursuant to Regulation Z,
12 CFR 1026.38(a)(3)(i). The provision of a corrected disclosure does
not affect how a financial institution determines the rate-set date. See comment 4(a)(12)-5. For example:
i. In the case of a financial institution’s
annual loan/application register submission made pursuant to section
1003.5(a)(1)(i), if the financial institution provides a corrected
disclosure pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v), that
reflects a corrected annual percentage rate, the financial institution
reports the difference between the corrected annual percentage rate
and the most recently available average prime offer rate that was
in effect for a comparable transaction as of the rate-set date only
if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower
prior to the end of the calendar year in which final action is taken.
ii. In the case of a financial
institution’s quarterly submission made pursuant to section
1003.5(a)(1)(ii), if the financial institution provides a corrected
disclosure pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v), that
reflects a corrected annual percentage rate, the financial institution
reports the difference between the corrected annual percentage rate
and the most recently available average prime offer rate that was
in effect for a comparable transaction as of the rate-set date only
if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior to
the end of the quarter in which final action is taken. The financial
institution does not report the difference between the corrected annual
percentage rate and the most recently available average prime offer
rate that was in effect for a comparable transaction as of the rate-set
date if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower after
the end of the quarter in which final action is taken, even if the
corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior to the deadline
for timely submission of the financial institution’s quarterly
data. However, the financial institution reports the difference between
the corrected annual percentage rate and the most recently available
average prime offer rate that was in effect for a comparable transaction
as of the rate-set date on its annual loan/application register, provided
that the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior to
the end of the calendar year in which final action is taken.
Paragraph 4(a)(13) 1. HOEPA status—not
applicable. If the covered loan is not subject to the Home Ownership
and Equity Protection Act of 1994, as implemented in Regulation Z,
12 CFR 1026.32, a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(13)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable. If an application
did not result in an origination, a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(13) by reporting that the requirement is not
applicable.
6-5284.2
Paragraph 4(a)(14) 1. Determining lien status
for applications and covered loans originated and purchased.
i. Financial institutions are required
to report lien status for covered loans they originate and purchase
and applications that do not result in originations (preapproval requests
that are approved but not accepted, preapproval requests that are
denied, applications that are approved but not accepted, denied, withdrawn,
or closed for incompleteness). For covered loans purchased by a financial
institution, lien status is determined by reference to the best information
readily available to the financial institution at the time of purchase.
For covered loans that a financial institution originates and applications
that do not result in originations, lien status is determined by reference
to the best information readily available to the financial institution
at the time final action is taken and to the financial institution’s
own procedures. Thus, financial institutions may rely on the title
search they routinely perform as part of their underwriting procedures—for
example, for home purchase loans. Regulation C does not require financial
institutions to perform title searches solely to comply with HMDA
reporting requirements. Financial institutions may rely on other information
that is readily available to them at the time final action is taken
and that they reasonably believe is accurate, such as the applicant’s
statement on the application or the applicant’s credit report.
For example, where the applicant indicates on the application that
there is a mortgage on the property or where the applicant’s
credit report shows that the applicant has a mortgage—and that
mortgage will not be paid off as part of the transaction—the
financial institution may assume that the loan it originates is secured
by a subordinate lien. If the same application did not result in an
origination—for example, because the application was denied
or with drawn—the financial institution would report the application
as an application for a subordinate-lien loan.
ii. Financial institutions may also consider
their established procedures when determining lien status for applications
that do not result in originations. For example, assume an applicant
applies to a financial institution to refinance a $100,000 first mortgage;
the applicant also has an open-end line of credit for $20,000. If
the financial institution’s practice in such a case is to ensure
that it will have first-lien position—through a subordination
agreement with the holder of the lien securing the open-end line of
credit—then the financial institution should report the application
as an application for a first-lien covered loan.
2. Multiple properties. See comment 4(a)(9)-2 regarding transactions involving multiple
properties with more than one property taken as security.
Paragraph 4(a)(15) 1. Credit score—relied
on. Except for purchased covered loans and partially exempt transactions
under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(15) requires a financial
institution to report the credit score or scores relied on in making
the credit decision and information about the scoring model used to
generate each score. A financial institution relies on a credit score
in making the credit decision if the credit score was a factor in
the credit decision even if it was not a dispositive factor. For example,
if a credit score is one of multiple factors in a financial institution’s
credit decision, the financial institution has relied on the credit
score even if the financial institution denies the application because
one or more underwriting requirements other than the credit score
are not satisfied.
2. Credit score—multiple credit scores. When a financial
institution obtains or creates two or more credit scores for a single
applicant or borrower but relies on only one score in making the credit
decision (for example, by relying on the lowest, highest, most recent,
or average of all of the scores), the financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(15) by reporting that credit score and information
about the scoring model used. When a financial institution uses more
than one credit scoring model and combines the scores into a composite
credit score that it relies on, the financial institution reports
that score and reports that more than one credit scoring model was
used. When a financial institution obtains or creates two or more
credit scores for an applicant or borrower and relies on multiple
scores for the applicant or borrower in making the credit decision
(for example, by relying on a scoring grid that considers each of
the scores obtained or created for the applicant or borrower without
combining the scores into a composite score), section 1003.4(a)(15)
requires the financial institution to report one of the credit scores
for the applicant or borrower that was relied on in making the credit
decision. In choosing which credit score to report in this circumstance,
a financial institution need not use the same approach for its entire
HMDA submission, but it should be generally consistent (such as by
routinely using one approach within a particular division of the institution
or for a category of covered loans). In instances such as these, the
financial institution should report the name and version of the credit
scoring model for the score reported.
3. Credit score—multiple applicants or borrowers. In a transaction involving two or more applicants or borrowers for
whom the financial institution obtains or creates a single credit
score and relies on that credit score in making the credit decision
for the transaction, the institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(15)
by reporting that credit score for the applicant and reporting that
the requirement is not applicable for the first co-applicant or, at
the financial institution’s discretion, by reporting that credit
score for the first co-applicant and reporting that the requirement
is not applicable for the applicant. Otherwise, a financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(15) by reporting a credit score for
the applicant that it relied on in making the credit decision, if
any, and a credit score for the first co-applicant that it relied
on in making the credit decision, if any. To illustrate, assume a
transaction involves one applicant and one co-applicant and that the
financial institution obtains or creates two credit scores for the
applicant and two credit scores for the co-applicant. Assume further
that the financial institution relies on a single credit score that
is the lowest, highest, most recent, or average of all of the credit
scores obtained or created to make the credit decision for the transaction.
The financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(15) by reporting
that credit score and information about the scoring model used for
the applicant and reporting that the requirement is not applicable
for the first co-applicant or, at the financial institution’s
discretion, by reporting the data for the first co-applicant and reporting
that the requirement is not applicable for the applicant. Alternatively,
assume a transaction involves one applicant and one co-applicant and
that the financial institution obtains or creates three credit scores
for the applicant and three credit scores for the co-applicant. Assume
further that the financial institution relies on the middle credit
score for the applicant and the middle credit score for the co-applicant
to make the credit decision for the transaction. The financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(15) by reporting both the middle score
for the applicant and the middle score for the co-applicant.
4. Transactions for which no
credit decision was made. If a file was closed for incompleteness
or the application was withdrawn before a credit decision was made,
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(15) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable, even if the financial institution
had obtained or created a credit score for the applicant or co-applicant.
For example, if a file is closed for incompleteness and is so reported
in accordance with section 1003.4(a)(8), the financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(15) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable, even if the financial institution had obtained
or created a credit score for the applicant or co-applicant. Similarly,
if an application was withdrawn by the applicant before a credit decision
was made and is so reported in accordance with section 1003.4(a)(8),
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(15) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable, even if the financial institution
had obtained or created a credit score for the applicant or co-applicant.
5. Transactions for which
no credit score was relied on. If a financial institution makes
a credit decision without relying on a credit score for the applicant
or borrower, the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(15)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable.
6. Purchased covered loan. A financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(15) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable when the covered loan is a purchased
covered loan.
7. Non-natural
person. When the applicant and co-applicant, if applicable, are
not natural persons, a financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(15) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable.
Paragraph 4(a)(16) 1. Reason for denial—general. A financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(16) by reporting
the principal reason or reasons it denied the application, indicating
up to four reasons. The financial institution should report only the
principal reason or reasons it denied the application, even if there
are fewer than four reasons. For example, if a financial institution
denies the application because of the applicant’s credit history
and debt-to-income ratio, the financial institution need only report
these two principal reasons. The reasons reported must be specific
and accurately describe the principal reason or reasons the financial
institution denied the application.
2. Reason for denial—preapproval request
denied. Section 1003.4(a)(16) requires a financial institution
to report the principal reason or reasons it denied the application.
A request for a preapproval under a preapproval program as defined
by section 1003.2(b)(2) is an application. If a financial institution
denies a preapproval request, the financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(16) by reporting the reason or reasons it denied
the preapproval request.
3. Reason for denial—adverse action model
form or similar form. If a financial institution chooses to provide
the applicant the reason or reasons it denied the application using
the model form contained in appendix C to Regulation B (Form C-1,
Sample Notice of Action Taken and Statement of Reasons) or a similar
form, section 1003.4(a)(16) requires the financial institution to
report the reason or reasons that were specified on the form by the
financial institution, which includes reporting the “Other”
reason or reasons that were specified on the form by the financial
institution, if applicable. If a financial institution chooses to
provide a disclosure of the applicant’s right to a statement
of specific reasons using the model form contained in appendix C to
Regulation B (Form C-5, Sample Disclosure of Right to Request Specific
Reasons for Credit Denial) or a similar form, or chooses to provide
the denial reason or reasons orally under Regulation B, 12 CFR 1002.9(a)(2)(ii),
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(16) by entering
the principal reason or reasons it denied the application.
4. Reason for denial—scope
of requirement. A financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(16) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable
if the action taken on the application, pursuant to section 1003.4(a)(8),
is not a denial. For example, a financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(16) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable
if the loan is originated or purchased by the financial institution,
or the application or preapproval request was approved but not accepted,
or the application was withdrawn before a credit decision was made,
or the file was closed for incompleteness. For partially exempt transactions
under section 1003.3(d), an insured depository institution or insured
credit union is not required to report the principal reason or reasons
it denied an application. See section 1003.3(d) and related
commentary.
Paragraph 4(a)(17)(i) 1. Total loan
costs—scope of requirement. Section 1003.4(a)(17)(i) does
not require financial institutions to report the total loan costs
for applications, or for transactions not subject to Regulation Z,
12 CFR 1026.43(c), and 12 CFR 1026.19(f), such as open-end lines of
credit, reverse mortgages, or loans or lines of credit made primarily
for business or commercial purposes. In these cases, a financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(17)(i) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable to the transaction. For partially exempt transactions
under section 1003.3(d), an insured depository institution or insured
credit union is not required to report the total loan costs. See section 1003.3(d) and related commentary.
2. Purchased loans—applications received
prior to the integrated disclosure effective date. For purchased
covered loans subject to this reporting requirement for which applications
were received by the selling entity prior to the effective date of
Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f), a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(17)(i) by reporting that the requirement is
not applicable to the transaction.
3. Corrected disclosures. If the amount of
total loan costs changes because a financial institution provides
a corrected version of the disclosures required under Regulation Z,
12 CFR 1026.19(f), pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2), the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(17)(i) by reporting the
corrected amount, provided that the corrected disclosure was provided
to the borrower prior to the end of the reporting period in which
closing occurs. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(17)(i), the date
the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower is the date
disclosed pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.38(a)(3)(i). For example:
i. In the case of a financial
institution’s annual loan/application register submission made
pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(i), if the financial institution
provides a corrected disclosure to the borrower to reflect a refund
made pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v), the financial
institution reports the corrected amount of total loan costs only
if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior to
the end of the calendar year in which closing occurs.
ii. In the case of a financial institution’s
quarterly submission made pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii), if
the financial institution provides a corrected disclosure to the borrower
to reflect a refund made pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v),
the financial institution reports the corrected amount of total loan
costs only if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower
prior to the end of the quarter in which closing occurs. The financial
institution does not report the corrected amount of total loan costs
in its quarterly submission if the corrected disclosure was provided
to the borrower after the end of the quarter in which closing occurs,
even if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior
to the deadline for timely submission of the financial institution’s
quarterly data. However, the financial institution reports the corrected
amount of total loan costs on its annual loan/application register,
provided that the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower
prior to the end of the calendar year in which closing occurs.
Paragraph 4(a)(17)(ii) 1. Total points
and fees—scope of requirement. Section 1003.4(a)(17)(ii)
does not require financial institutions to report the total points
and fees for transactions not subject to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.43(c),
such as open-end lines of credit, reverse mortgages, or loans or lines
of credit made primarily for business or commercial purposes, or for
applications or purchased covered loans. In these cases, a financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(17)(ii) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable to the transaction. For partially
exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d), an insured depository
institution or insured credit union is not required to report the
total points and fees. See section 1003.3(d) and related commentary.
2. Total points and fees
cure mechanism. For covered loans subject to this reporting requirement,
if a financial institution determines that the transaction’s
total points and fees exceeded the applicable limit and cures the
overage pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(3)(iii) and (iv),
a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(17)(ii) by
reporting the correct amount of total points and fees, provided that
the cure was effected during the same reporting period in which closing
occurred. For example, in the case of a financial institution’s
quarterly submission, the financial institution reports the revised
amount of total points and fees only if it cured the overage prior
to the end of the quarter in which closing occurred. The financial
institution does not report the revised amount of total points and
fees in its quarterly submission if it cured the overage after the
end of the quarter, even if the cure was effected prior to the deadline
for timely submission of the financial institution’s quarterly
data. However, the financial institution reports the revised amount
of total points and fees on its annual loan/application register.
Paragraph 4(a)(18) 1. Origination charges—scope
of requirement. Section 1003.4(a)(18) does not require financial
institutions to report the total borrower-paid origination charges
for applications, or for transactions not subject to Regulation Z,
12 CFR 1026.19(f), such as open-end lines of credit, reverse mortgages,
or loans or lines of credit made primarily for business or commercial
purposes. In these cases, a financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(18) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable
to the transaction. For partially exempt transactions under section
1003.3(d), an insured depository institution or insured credit union
is not required to report the total borrower-paid origination charges. See section 1003.3(d) and related commentary.
2. Purchased loans—applications received
prior to the integrated disclosure effective date. For purchased
covered loans subject to this reporting requirement for which applications
were received by the selling entity prior to the effective date of
Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f), a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(18) by reporting that the requirement is not
applicable to the transaction.
3. Corrected disclosures. If the total amount
of borrower-paid origination charges changes because a financial institution
provides a corrected version of the disclosures required under Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f), pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2), the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(18) by reporting the corrected
amount, provided that the corrected disclosure was provided to the
borrower prior to the end of the reporting period in which closing
occurs. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(18), the date the corrected
disclosure was provided to the borrower is the date disclosed pursuant
to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.38(a)(3)(i). For example:
i. In the case of a financial institution’s
annual loan/application register submission made pursuant to section
1003.5(a)(1)(i), if the financial institution provides a corrected
disclosure to the borrower to reflect a refund made pursuant to Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v), the financial institution reports the
corrected amount of borrower-paid origination charges only if the
corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior to the end
of the calendar year in which closing occurs.
ii. In the case of a financial institution’s
quarterly submission made pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii), if
the financial institution provides a corrected disclosure to the borrower
to reflect a refund made pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v),
the financial institution reports the corrected amount of borrower-paid
origination charges only if the corrected disclosure was provided
to the borrower prior to the end of the quarter in which closing occurs.
The financial institution does not report the corrected amount of
borrower-paid origination charges in its quarterly submission if the
corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower after the end of
the quarter in which closing occurs, even if the corrected disclosure
was provided to the borrower prior to the deadline for timely submission
of the financial institution’s quarterly data. However, the
financial institution reports the corrected amount of borrower-paid
origination charges on its annual loan/application register, provided
that the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior to
the end of the calendar year in which closing occurs.
Paragraph 4(a)(19) 1. Discount points—scope
of requirement. Section 1003.4(a)(19) does not require financial
institutions to report the discount points for applications, or for
transactions not subject to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f), such
as open-end lines of credit, reverse mortgages, or loans or lines
of credit made primarily for business or commercial purposes. In these
cases, a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(19)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable to the transaction.
For partially exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d), an insured
depository institution or insured credit union is not required to
report the discount points. See section 1003.3(d) and related
commentary.
2. Purchased
loans—applications received prior to the integrated disclosure
effective date. For purchased covered loans subject to this reporting
requirement for which applications were received by the selling entity
prior to the effective date of Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f), a
financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(19) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable to the transaction.
3. Corrected disclosures. If the amount of discount points changes because a financial institution
provides a corrected version of the disclosures required under Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f), pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2), the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(19) by reporting the corrected
amount, provided that the corrected disclosure was provided to the
borrower prior to the end of the reporting period in which closing occurs.
For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(19), the date the corrected disclosure
was provided to the borrower is the date disclosed pursuant to Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.38(a)(3)(i). For example:
i. In the case of a financial institution’s
annual loan/application register submission made pursuant to section
1003.5(a)(1)(i), if the financial institution provides a corrected
disclosure to the borrower to reflect a refund made pursuant to Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v), the financial institution reports the
corrected amount of discount points only if the corrected disclosure
was provided to the borrower prior to the end of the calendar year
in which closing occurred.
ii. In the case of a financial institution’s
quarterly submission made pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii), if
the financial institution provides a corrected disclosure to the borrower
to reflect a refund made pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v),
the financial institution reports the corrected amount of discount
points only if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower
prior to the end of the quarter in which closing occurred. The financial
institution does not report the corrected amount of discount points
in its quarterly submission if the corrected disclosure was provided
to the borrower after the end of the quarter in which closing occurred,
even if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior
to the deadline for timely submission of the financial institution’s
quarterly data. However, the financial institution reports the corrected
amount of discount points on its annual loan/application register,
provided that the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower
prior to the end of the calendar year in which closing occurred.
Paragraph 4(a)(20) 1. Lender credits—scope
of requirement. Section 1003.4(a)(20) does not require financial
institutions to report lender credits for applications, or for transactions
not subject to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f), such as open-end lines
of credit, reverse mortgages, or loans or lines of credit made primarily
for business or commercial purposes. In these cases, a financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(20) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable to the transaction. For partially exempt transactions
under section 1003.3(d), an insured depository institution or insured
credit union is not required to report lender credits. See section
1003.3(d) and related commentary.
2. Purchased loans—applications received
prior to the integrated disclosure effective date. For purchased
covered loans subject to this reporting requirement for which applications
were received by the selling entity prior to the effective date of
Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f), a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(20) by reporting that the requirement is not
applicable to the transaction.
3. Corrected disclosures. If the amount of
lender credits changes because a financial institution provides a
corrected version of the disclosures required under Regulation Z,
12 CFR 1026.19(f), pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2), the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(20) by reporting the corrected
amount, provided that the corrected disclosure was provided to the
borrower prior to the end of the reporting period in which closing
occurred. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(20), the date the corrected
disclosure was provided to the borrower is the date disclosed pursuant
to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.38(a)(3)(i). For example:
i. In the case of a financial institution’s
annual loan/application register submission made pursuant to section
1003.5(a)(1)(i), if the financial institution provides a corrected
disclosure to the borrower to reflect a refund made pursuant to Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v), the financial institution reports the
corrected amount of lender credits only if the corrected disclosure
was provided to the borrower prior to the end of the calendar year
in which closing occurred.
ii. In the case of a financial institution’s quarterly
submission made pursuant to section 1003.5(a)(1)(ii), if the financial
institution provides a corrected disclosure to the borrower to reflect
a refund made pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(f)(2)(v), the
financial institution reports the corrected amount of lender credits
only if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior
to the end of the quarter in which closing occurred. The financial
institution does not report the corrected amount of lender credits
in its quarterly submission if the corrected disclosure was provided
to the borrower after the end of the quarter in which closing occurred,
even if the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower prior
to the deadline for timely submission of the financial institution’s
quarterly data. However, the financial institution reports the corrected
amount of lender credits on its annual loan/application register,
provided that the corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower
prior to the end of the calendar year in which closing occurred.
Paragraph 4(a)(21) 1. Interest
rate—disclosures. Except for partially exempt transactions
under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(21) requires a financial
institution to identify the interest rate applicable to the approved
application, or to the covered loan at closing or account opening.
For covered loans or applications subject to the integrated mortgage
disclosure requirements of Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(e) and (f),
a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(21) by reporting
the interest rate disclosed on the applicable disclosure. For covered
loans or approved applications for which disclosures were provided
pursuant to both the early and the final disclosure requirements in
Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(e) and (f), a financial institution reports
the interest rate disclosed pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(f). A financial
institution may rely on the definitions and commentary to the sections
of Regulation Z relevant to the disclosure of the interest rate pursuant
to 12 CFR 1026.19(e) or (f). If a financial institution provides a
revised or corrected version of the disclosures required under Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.19(e) or (f), pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(e)(3)(iv)
or (f)(2), as applicable, the financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(21) by reporting the interest rate on the revised
or corrected disclosure, provided that the revised or corrected disclosure
was provided to the borrower prior to the end of the reporting period
in which final action is taken. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(21),
the date the revised or corrected disclosure was provided to the borrower
is the date disclosed pursuant to Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.37(a)(4)
or 1026.38(a)(3)(i), as applicable.
2. Applications. In the case of an application,
section 1003.4(a)(21) requires a financial institution to report the
applicable interest rate only if the application has been approved
by the financial institution but not accepted by the borrower. In
such cases, a financial institution reports the interest rate applicable
at the time that the application was approved by the financial institution.
A financial institution may report the interest rate appearing on
the disclosure provided pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.19(e) or (f) if such
disclosure accurately reflects the interest rate at the time the application
was approved. For applications that have been denied or withdrawn,
or files closed for incompleteness, a financial institution reports
that no interest rate was applicable to the application.
3. Adjustable rate—interest
rate unknown. Except as provided in comment 4(a)(21)-1, for adjustable-rate
covered loans or applications, if the interest rate is unknown at
the time that the application was approved, or at closing or account
opening, a financial institution reports the fully-indexed rate based
on the index applicable to the covered loan or application. For purposes
of section 1003.4(a)(21), the fully-indexed rate is the index value
and margin at the time that the application was approved, or, for
covered loans, at closing or account opening.
Paragraph 4(a)(22) 1. Prepayment penalty term—scope
of requirement. Section 1003.4(a)(22) does not require financial
institutions to report the term of any prepayment penalty for
transactions not subject to Regulation Z, 12 CFR part 1026, such as
loans or lines of credit made primarily for business or commercial
purposes, or for reverse mortgages or purchased covered loans. In
these cases, a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(22)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable to the transaction.
For partially exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d), an insured
depository institution or insured credit union is not required to
report the term of any prepayment penalty. See section 1003.3(d)
and related commentary.
2. Transactions for which no prepayment penalty exists. For covered
loans or applications that have no prepayment penalty, a financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(22) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable to the transaction. A financial
institution may rely on the definitions and commentary to Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.32(b)(6)(i) or (ii) in determining whether the terms
of a transaction contain a prepayment penalty.
Paragraph 4(a)(23) 1. General. For covered
loans that are not purchased covered loans and that are not partially
exempt under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(23) requires a financial
institution to report the ratio of the applicant’s or borrower’s
total monthly debt to total monthly income (debt-to-income ratio)
relied on in making the credit decision. For example, if a financial
institution calculated the applicant’s or borrower’s debt-to-income
ratio twice—once according to the financial institution’s
own requirements and once according to the requirements of a secondary
market investor—and the financial institution relied on the
debt-to-income ratio calculated according to the secondary market
investor’s requirements in making the credit decision, section
1003.4(a)(23) requires the financial institution to report the debt-to-income
ratio calculated according to the requirements of the secondary market
investor.
2. Transactions
for which a debt-to-income ratio was one of multiple factors. A financial institution relies on the ratio of the applicant’s
or borrower’s total monthly debt to total monthly income (debt-to-income
ratio) in making the credit decision if the debt-to-income ratio was
a factor in the credit decision even if it was not a dispositive factor.
For example, if the debt-to-income ratio was one of multiple factors
in a financial institution’s credit decision, the financial
institution has relied on the debt-to-income ratio and complies with
section 1003.4(a)(23) by reporting the debt-to-income ratio, even
if the financial institution denied the application because one or
more underwriting requirements other than the debt-to-income ratio
were not satisfied.
3. Transactions for which no credit decision was made. If a file
was closed for incompleteness, or if an application was withdrawn
before a credit decision was made, a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(23) by reporting that the requirement is not
applicable, even if the financial institution had calculated the ratio
of the applicant’s total monthly debt to total monthly income
(debt-to-income ratio). For example, if a file was closed for incompleteness
and was so reported in accordance with section 1003.4(a)(8), the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(23) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable, even if the financial institution
had calculated the applicant’s debt-to-income ratio. Similarly,
if an application was withdrawn by the applicant before a credit decision
was made, the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(23)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable, even if the financial
institution had calculated the applicant’s debt-to-income ratio.
4. Transactions for which
no debt-to-income ratio was relied on. Section 1003.4(a)(23)
does not require a financial institution to calculate the ratio of
an applicant’s or borrower’s total monthly debt to total
monthly income (debt-to-income ratio), nor does it require a financial
institution to rely on an applicant’s or borrower’s debt-to-income
ratio in making a credit decision. If a financial institution made
a credit decision without relying on the applicant’s or borrower’s
debt-to-income ratio, the financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(23) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable
since no debt-to-income ratio was relied on in connection with the
credit decision.
5. Non-natural person. A financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(23) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable
when the applicant and co-applicant, if applicable, are not natural
persons.
6. Multifamily
dwellings. A financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(23)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable for a covered
loan secured by, or an application proposed to be secured by, a multifamily
dwelling.
7. Purchased
covered loans. A financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(23) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable
when reporting a purchased covered loan.
Paragraph 4(a)(24) 1. General. Except for
purchased covered loans and partially exempt transactions under section
1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(24) requires a financial institution
to report the ratio of the total amount of debt secured by the property
to the value of the property (combined loan-to-value ratio) relied
on in making the credit decision. For example, if a financial institution
calculated a combined loan-to-value ratio twice—once according
to the financial institution’s own requirements and once according
to the requirements of a secondary market investor—and the financial
institution relied on the combined loan-to-value ratio calculated
according to the secondary market investor’s requirements in
making the credit decision, section 1003.4(a)(24) requires the financial
institution to report the combined loan-to-value ratio calculated
according to the requirements of the secondary market investor.
2. Transactions for which
a combined loan-to-value ratio was one of multiple factors. A
financial institution relies on the ratio of the total amount of debt
secured by the property to the value of the property (combined loan-to-value
ratio) in making the credit decision if the combined loan-to-value
ratio was a factor in the credit decision, even if it was not a dispositive
factor. For example, if the combined loan-to-value ratio is one of
multiple factors in a financial institution’s credit decision,
the financial institution has relied on the combined loan-to-value
ratio and complies with section 1003.4(a)(24) by reporting the combined
loan-to-value ratio, even if the financial institution denies the
application because one or more underwriting requirements other than
the combined loan-to-value ratio are not satisfied.
3. Transactions for which no credit decision
was made. If a file was closed for incompleteness, or if an application
was withdrawn before a credit decision was made, a financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(24) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable, even if the financial institution had calculated
the ratio of the total amount of debt secured by the property to the
value of the property (combined loan-to-value ratio). For example,
if a file is closed for incompleteness and is so reported in accordance
with section 1003.4(a)(8), the financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(24) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable,
even if the financial institution had calculated a combined loan-to-value
ratio. Similarly, if an application was withdrawn by the applicant
before a credit decision was made and is so reported in accordance
with section 1003.4(a)(8), the financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(24) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable,
even if the financial institution had calculated a combined loan-to-value
ratio.
4. Transactions
for which no combined loan-to-value ratio was relied on. Section
1003.4(a)(24) does not require a financial institution to calculate
the ratio of the total amount of debt secured by the property to the
value of the property (combined loan-to-value ratio), nor does it
require a financial institution to rely on a combined loan-to-value
ratio in making a credit decision. If a financial institution makes
a credit decision without relying on a combined loan-to-value
ratio, the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(24)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable since no combined
loan-to-value ratio was relied on in making the credit decision.
5. Purchased covered loan. A financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(24) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable when the covered loan is a
purchased covered loan.
6. Property. A financial institution reports the combined loan-to-value
ratio relied on in making the credit decision, regardless of which
property or properties it used in the combined loan-to-value ratio
calculation. The property used in the combined loan-to-value ratio
calculation does not need to be the property identified in section
1003.4(a)(9) and may include more than one property and non-real property.
For example, if a financial institution originated a covered loan
for the purchase of a multifamily dwelling, the loan was secured by
the multifamily dwelling and by non-real property, such as securities,
and the financial institution used the multifamily dwelling and the
non-real property to calculate the combined loan-to-value ratio that
it relied on in making the credit decision, section 1003.4(a)(24)
requires the financial institution to report the relied upon ratio.
Section 1003.4(a)(24) does not require a financial institution to
use a particular combined loan-to-value ratio calculation method but
instead requires financial institutions to report the combined loan-to-value
ratio relied on in making the credit decision.
Paragraph 4(a)(25) 1. Amortization and maturity. For a fully amortizing covered loan, the number of months after
which the legal obligation matures is the number of months in the
amortization schedule, ending with the final payment. Some covered
loans do not fully amortize during the maturity term, such as covered
loans with a balloon payment; such loans should still be reported
using the maturity term rather than the amortization term, even in
the case of covered loans that mature before fully amortizing but
have reset options. For example, a 30-year fully amortizing covered
loan would be reported with a term of “360,” while a five
year balloon covered loan would be reported with a loan term of “60.”
2. Non-monthly repayment
periods. If a covered loan or application includes a schedule
with repayment periods measured in a unit of time other than months,
the financial institution should report the covered loan or application
term using an equivalent number of whole months without regard for
any remainder.
3. Purchased
loans. For a covered loan that was purchased, a financial institution
reports the number of months after which the legal obligation matures
as measured from the covered loan’s origination.
4. Open-end line of credit. For an open-end line of credit with a definite term, a financial
institution reports the number of months from origination until the
account termination date, including both the draw and repayment period.
5. Loan term—scope
of requirement. For a covered loan or application without a definite
term, such as a reverse mortgage, a financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(25) by reporting that the requirement is not
applicable. For partially exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d),
an insured depository institution or insured credit union is not required
to report the loan term. See section 1003.3(d) and related
commentary.
Paragraph 4(a)(26) 1. Types of
introductory rates. Except for partially exempt transactions
under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(26) requires a financial
institution to report the number of months, or proposed number of
months in the case of an application, from closing or account opening
until the first date the interest rate may change. For example, assume
an open-end line of credit contains an introductory or “teaser”
interest rate for two months after the date of account opening, after which
the interest rate may adjust. In this example, the financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(26) by reporting the number of months
as “2.” Section 1003.4(a)(26) requires a financial institution
to report the number of months based on when the first interest rate
adjustment may occur, even if an interest rate adjustment is not required
to occur at that time and even if the rates that will apply, or the
periods for which they will apply, are not known at closing or account
opening. For example, if a closed-end mortgage loan with a 30-year
term has an adjustable-rate product with an introductory interest
rate for the first 60 months, after which the interest rate is permitted,
but not required to vary, according to the terms of an index rate,
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(26) by reporting
the number of months as “60.” Similarly, if a closed-end
mortgage loan with a 30-year term is a step-rate product with an introductory
interest rate for the first 24 months, after which the interest rate
will increase to a different known interest rate for the next 36 months,
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(26) by reporting
the number of months as “24.”
2. Preferred rates. Section 1003.4(a)(26)
does not require reporting of introductory interest rate periods based
on preferred rates unless the terms of the legal obligation provide
that the preferred rate will expire at a certain defined date. Preferred
rates include terms of the legal obligation that provide that the
initial underlying rate is fixed but that it may increase or decrease
upon the occurrence of some future event, such as an employee leaving
the employ of the financial institution, the borrower closing an existing
deposit account with the financial institution, or the borrower revoking
an election to make automated payments. In these cases, because it
is not known at the time of closing or account opening whether the
future event will occur, and if so, when it will occur, section 1003.4(a)(26)
does not require reporting of an introductory interest rate period.
3. Loan or application
with a fixed rate. A financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(26) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable
for a covered loan with a fixed rate or an application for a covered
loan with a fixed rate.
4. Purchased loan. A financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(26) by reporting that requirement is not applicable when
the covered loan is a purchased covered loan with a fixed rate.
5. Non-monthly introductory
periods. If a covered loan or application includes an introductory
interest rate period measured in a unit of time other than months,
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(26) by reporting
the introductory interest rate period for the covered loan or application
using an equivalent number of whole months without regard for any
remainder. For example, assume an open-end line of credit contains
an introductory interest rate for 50 days after the date of account
opening, after which the interest rate may adjust. In this example,
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(26) by reporting
the number of months as “1.” The financial institution
must report one month for any introductory interest rate period that
totals less than one whole month.
Paragraph 4(a)(27) 1. General. Except for partially exempt transactions
under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(27) requires reporting
of contractual features that would allow payments other than fully
amortizing payments. Section 1003.4(a)(27) defines the contractual
features by reference to Regulation Z, 12 CFR part 1026, but without
regard to whether the covered loan is consumer credit, as defined
in section 1026.2(a)(12), is extended by a creditor, as defined in
section 1026.2(a)(17), or is extended to a consumer, as defined in
section 1026.2(a)(11), and without regard to whether the property
is a dwelling as defined in section 1026.2(a)(19). For example, assume
that a financial institution originates a business-purpose transaction
that is exempt from Regulation Z pursuant to 12 CFR 1026.3(a)(1),
to finance the purchase of a multifamily dwelling, and that there is
a balloon payment, as defined by Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.18(s)(5)(i),
at the end of the loan term. The multifamily dwelling is a dwelling
under section 1003.2(f), but not under Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.2(a)(19).
In this example, the financial institution should report the business-purpose
transaction as having a balloon payment under section 1003.4(a)(27)(i),
assuming the other requirements of this part are met. Aside from these
distinctions, financial institutions may rely on the definitions and
related commentary provided in the appropriate sections of Regulation
Z referenced in section 1003.4(a)(27) of this part in determining
whether the contractual feature should be reported.
Paragraph 4(a)(28) 1. General. Except for
partially exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(28)
requires a financial institution to report the property value relied
on in making the credit decision. For example, if the institution
relies on an appraisal or other valuation for the property in calculating
the loan-to-value ratio, it reports that value; if the institution
relies on the purchase price of the property in calculating the loan-to-value
ratio, it reports that value.
2. Multiple property values. When a financial
institution obtains two or more valuations of the property securing
or proposed to secure the covered loan, the financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(28) by reporting the value relied
on in making the credit decision. For example, when a financial institution
obtains an appraisal, an automated valuation model report, and a broker
price opinion with different values for the property, it reports the
value relied on in making the credit decision. Section 1003.4(a)(28)
does not require a financial institution to use a particular property
valuation method, but instead requires a financial institution to
report the valuation relied on in making the credit decision.
3. Transactions for which no
credit decision was made. If a file was closed for incompleteness
or the application was withdrawn before a credit decision was made,
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(28) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable, even if the financial institution
had obtained a property value. For example, if a file is closed for
incompleteness and is so reported in accordance with section 1003.4(a)(8),
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(28) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable, even if the financial institution
had obtained a property value. Similarly, if an application was withdrawn
by the applicant before a credit decision was made and is so reported
in accordance with section 1003.4(a)(8), the financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(28) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable, even if the financial institution had obtained
a property value.
4. Transactions for which no property value was relied on. Section
1003.4(a)(28) does not require a financial institution to obtain a
property valuation, nor does it require a financial institution to
rely on a property value in making a credit decision. If a financial
institution makes a credit decision without relying on a property
value, the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(28)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable since no property
value was relied on in making the credit decision.
Paragraph 4(a)(29) 1. Classification under state
law. A financial institution should report a covered loan that
is or would have been secured only by a manufactured home but not
the land on which it is sited as secured by a manufactured home and
not land, even if the manufactured home is considered real property
under applicable State law.
2. Manufactured home community. A manufactured
home community that is a multifamily dwelling is not considered a
manufactured home for purposes of section 1003.4(a)(29).
3. Multiple properties. See comment 4(a)(9)-2 regarding transactions involving
multiple properties with more than one property taken as security.
4. Scope of requirement. A financial institution reports that the requirement is not applicable
for a covered loan where the dwelling related to the property identified
in section 1003.4(a)(9) is not a manufactured home. For partially
exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d), an insured depository
institution or insured credit union is not required to report the
information specified in section 1003.4(a)(29). See section
1003.3(d) and related commentary.
Paragraph 4(a)(30) 1. Indirect land ownership. Indirect land
ownership can occur when the applicant or borrower is or will be a
member of a resident-owned community structured as a housing cooperative
in which the occupants own an entity that holds the underlying land
of the manufactured home community. In such communities, the applicant
or borrower may still have a lease and pay rent for the lot on which
his or her manufactured home is or will be located, but the property
interest type for such an arrangement should be reported as indirect
ownership if the applicant is or will be a member of the cooperative
that owns the underlying land of the manufactured home community.
If an applicant resides or will reside in such a community but is
not a member, the property interest type should be reported as a paid
leasehold.
2. Leasehold
interest. A leasehold interest could be formalized in a lease
with a defined term and specified rent payments, or could arise as
a tenancy at will through permission of a land owner without any written,
formal arrangement. For example, assume a borrower will locate the
manufactured home in a manufactured home community, has a written
lease for a lot in that park, and the lease specifies rent payments.
In this example, a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(30)
by reporting a paid leasehold. However, if instead the borrower will
locate the manufactured home on land owned by a family member without
a written lease and with no agreement as to rent payments, a financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(30) by reporting an unpaid
leasehold.
3. Multiple
properties. See comment 4(a)(9)-2 regarding transactions
involving multiple properties with more than one property taken as
security.
4. Manufactured
home community. A manufactured home community that is a multifamily
dwelling is not considered a manufactured home for purposes of section
1003.4(a)(30).
5. Direct
ownership. An applicant or borrower has a direct ownership interest
in the land on which the dwelling is or is to be located when it has
a more than possessory real property ownership interest in the land
such as fee simple ownership.
6. Scope of requirement. A financial institution
reports that the requirement is not applicable for a covered loan
where the dwelling related to the property identified in section 1003.4(a)(9)
is not a manufactured home. For partially exempt transactions under
section 1003.3(d), an insured depository institution or insured credit
union is not required to report the information specified in section
1003.4(a)(30). See section 1003.3(d) and related commentary.
Paragraph 4(a)(31) 1. Multiple properties. See comment 4(a)(9)-2 regarding transactions involving multiple
properties with more than one property taken as security.
2. Manufactured home community. For an application or covered loan secured by a manufactured home
community, the financial institution should include in the number
of individual dwelling units the total number of manufactured home
sites that secure the loan and are available for occupancy, regardless
of whether the sites are currently occupied or have manufactured homes
currently attached. A financial institution may include in the number
of individual dwelling units other units such as recreational vehicle
pads, manager apartments, rental apartments, site-built homes or other
rentable space that are ancillary to the operation of the secured
property if it considers such units under its underwriting guidelines
or the guidelines of an investor, or if it tracks the number of such
units for its own internal purposes. For a loan secured by a single
manufactured home that is or will be located in a manufactured home
community, the financial institution should report one individual
dwelling unit.
3. Condominium
and cooperative projects. For a covered loan secured by a condominium
or cooperative property, the financial institution reports the total
number of individual dwelling units securing the covered loan or proposed
to secure the covered loan in the case of an application. For example:
i. Assume that a loan is secured
by the entirety of a cooperative property. The financial institution
would report the number of individual dwelling units in the cooperative
property.
ii. Assume
that a covered loan is secured by 30 individual dwelling units in
a condominium property that contains 100 individual dwelling units
and that the loan is not exempt from Regulation C under section 1003.3(c)(3).
The financial institution reports 30 individual dwelling units.
4. Best information
available. A financial institution may rely on the best information
readily available to the financial institution at the time final action
is taken and on the financial institution’s own procedures in
reporting the information required by section 1003.4(a)(31). Information
readily available could include, for example, information provided
by an applicant that the financial institution reasonably believes,
information contained in a property valuation or inspection, or information
obtained from public records.
Paragraph 4(a)(32) 1. Affordable housing income restrictions. For purposes of section 1003.4(a)(32), affordable housing income-restricted
units are individual dwelling units that have restrictions based on
the income level of occupants pursuant to restrictive covenants encumbering
the property. Such income levels are frequently expressed as a percentage
of area median income by household size as established by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development or another agency responsible
for implementing the applicable affordable housing program. Such restrictions
are frequently part of compliance with programs that provide public
funds, special tax treatment, or density bonuses to encourage development
or preservation of affordable housing. Such restrictions are frequently
evidenced by a use agreement, regulatory agreement, land use restriction
agreement, housing assistance payments contract, or similar agreement.
Rent control or rent stabilization laws, and the acceptance by the
owner or manager of a multifamily dwelling of Housing Choice Vouchers
(24 CFR part 982) or other similar forms of portable housing assistance
that are tied to an occupant and not an individual dwelling unit,
are not affordable housing income-restricted dwelling units for purposes
of section 1003.4(a)(32).
2. Federal affordable housing sources. Examples
of Federal programs and funding sources that may result in individual
dwelling units that are reportable under section 1003.4(a)(32) include,
but are not limited to:
i. Affordable housing programs pursuant
to section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f);
ii. Public housing (42
U.S.C. 1437a(b)(6));
iii. The HOME Investment Partnerships program (24 CFR part 92);
iv. The Community Development
Block Grant program (24 CFR part 570);
v. Multifamily tax subsidy project funding
through tax-exempt bonds or tax credits (26 U.S.C. 42; 26 U.S.C. 142(d));
vi. Project-based vouchers
(24 CFR part 983);
vii. Federal Home Loan Bank affordable housing program funding (12
CFR part 1291); and
viii. Rural Housing Service multifamily housing loans and grants
(7 CFR part 3560).
3. State and local government affordable housing
sources. Examples of State and local sources that may result in individual
dwelling units that are reportable under section 1003.4(a)(32) include,
but are not limited to: State or local administration of Federal funds
or programs; State or local funding programs for affordable housing
or rental assistance, including programs operated by independent public
authorities; inclusionary zoning laws; and tax abatement or tax increment
financing contingent on affordable housing requirements.
4. Multiple properties. See comment 4(a)(9)-2 regarding transactions involving multiple
properties with more than one property taken as security.
5. Best information available. A financial institution may rely on the best information readily
available to the financial institution at the time final action is
taken and on the financial institution’s own procedures in reporting
the information required by section 1003.4(a)(32). Information readily
available could include, for example, information provided by an applicant
that the financial institution reasonably believes, information contained
in a property valuation or inspection, or information obtained from
public records.
6. Scope
of requirement. A financial institution reports that the requirement
is not applicable if the property securing the covered loan or, in
the case of an application, proposed to secure the covered loan is
not a multifamily dwelling. For partially exempt transactions under
section 1003.3(d), an insured depository institution or insured credit
union is not required to report the information specified in section
1003.4(a)(32). See section 1003.3(d) and related commentary.
Paragraph 4(a)(33) 1. Agents. If a financial
institution is reporting actions taken by its agent consistent with
comment 4(a)-4, the agent is not considered the financial institution
for the purposes of section 1003.4(a)(33). For example, assume that
an applicant submitted an application to Financial Institution A,
and Financial Institution A made the credit decision acting as Financial
Institution B’s agent under State law. A covered loan was originated
and the obligation arising from a covered loan was initially payable
to Financial Institution A. Financial Institution B purchased the
loan. Financial Institution B reports the origination and not the
purchase, and indicates that the application was not submitted directly
to the financial institution and that the transaction was not initially
payable to the financial institution.
Paragraph 4(a)(33)(i) 1. General. Except for
partially exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(33)(i)
requires a financial institution to indicate whether the applicant
or borrower submitted the application directly to the financial institution
that is reporting the covered loan or application. The following scenarios
demonstrate whether an application was submitted directly to the financial
institution that is reporting the covered loan or application.
i. The application was submitted
directly to the financial institution if the mortgage loan originator
identified pursuant to section 1003.4(a)(34) was an employee of the
reporting financial institution when the originator performed the
origination activities for the covered loan or application that is
being reported.
ii.
The application was also submitted directly to the financial institution
reporting the covered loan or application if the reporting financial
institution directed the applicant to a third-party agent (e.g., a
credit union service organization) that performed loan origination
activities on behalf of the financial institution and did not assist
the applicant with applying for covered loans with other institutions.
iii. If an applicant
contacted and completed an application with a broker or correspondent
that forwarded the application to a financial institution for approval,
an application was not submitted to the financial institution.
Paragraph 4(a)(33)(ii) 1. General. Except for partially exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d),
section 1003.4(a)(33)(ii) requires financial institutions to report
whether the obligation arising from a covered loan was or, in the
case of an application, would have been initially payable to the institution.
An obligation is initially payable to the institution if the obligation
is initially payable either on the face of the note or contract to
the financial institution that is reporting the covered loan or application.
For example, if a financial institution reported an origination of
a covered loan that it approved prior to closing, that closed in the
name of a third-party, such as a correspondent lender, and that the
financial institution purchased after closing, the covered loan was
not initially payable to the financial institution.
2. Applications. A financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(33)(ii) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable if the institution had not determined whether the
covered loan would have been initially payable to the institution
reporting the application when the application was withdrawn, denied,
or closed for incompleteness.
Paragraph 4(a)(34) 1. NMLSR ID. Except for partially exempt transactions
under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(34) requires a financial
institution to report the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and
Registry unique identifier (NMLSR ID) for the mortgage loan originator,
as defined in Regulation G, 12 CFR 1007.102, or Regulation H, 12 CFR
1008.23, as applicable. The NMLSR ID is a unique number or other identifier
generally assigned to individuals registered or licensed through NMLSR
to provide loan originating services. For more information, see the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008,
title V of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (S.A.F.E.
Act), 12 U.S.C. 5101 et seq., and its implementing regulations
(12 CFR part 1007 and 12 CFR part 1008).
2. Mortgage loan originator without NMLSR ID. An NMLSR ID for the mortgage loan originator is not required by
section 1003.4(a)(34) to be reported by a financial institution if
the mortgage loan originator is not required to obtain and has not
been assigned an NMLSR ID. For example, certain individual mortgage
loan originators may not be required to obtain an NMLSR ID for the
particular transaction being reported by the financial institution,
such as a commercial loan. However, some mortgage loan originators
may have obtained an NMLSR ID even if they are not required to obtain
one for that particular transaction. If a mortgage loan originator
has been assigned an NMLSR ID, a financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(34) by reporting the mortgage loan originator’s
NMLSR ID regardless of whether the mortgage loan originator is required
to obtain an NMLSR ID for the particular transaction being reported
by the financial institution. In the event that the mortgage loan
originator is not required to obtain and has not been assigned an
NMLSR ID, a financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(34)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable.
3. Multiple mortgage loan originators. If more than one individual associated with a covered loan or application
meets the definition of a mortgage loan originator, as defined in
Regulation G, 12 CFR 1007.102, or Regulation H, 12 CFR 1008.23, a
financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(34) by reporting
the NMLSR ID of the individual mortgage loan originator with primary
responsibility for the transaction as of the date of action taken
pursuant to section 1003.4(a)(8)(ii). A financial institution that
establishes and follows a reasonable, written policy for determining
which individual mortgage loan originator has primary responsibility
for the reported transaction as of the date of action taken complies
with section 1003.4(a)(34).
4. Purchased loans. If a financial institution
purchases a covered loan that satisfies the coverage criteria of Regulation
Z, 12 CFR 1026.36(g), and that was originated prior to January 10,
2014, the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(34)
by reporting that the requirement is not applicable. In addition,
if a financial institution purchases a covered loan that does not
satisfy the cover age criteria of Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.36(g),
and that was originated prior to January 1, 2018, the financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(34) by reporting that the requirement
is not applicable. Purchasers of both such types of covered loans
may report the NMLSR ID.
Paragraph
4(a)(35) 1. Automated underwriting system data—general. Except for
purchased covered loans and partially exempt transactions under section
1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(35) requires a financial institution
to report the name of the automated underwriting system (AUS) used
by the financial institution to evaluate the application and the result
generated by that AUS. The following scenarios illustrate when a financial
institution reports the name of the AUS used by the financial institution
to evaluate the application and the result generated by that AUS.
i. A financial institution
that uses an AUS, as defined in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii), to evaluate
an application, must report the name of the AUS used by the financial
institution to evaluate the application and the result generated by
that system, regardless of whether the AUS was used in its underwriting
process. For example, if a financial institution uses an AUS to evaluate
an application prior to submitting the application through its underwriting
process, the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35)
by reporting the name of the AUS it used to evaluate the application
and the result generated by that system.
ii. A financial institution that uses an
AUS, as defined in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii), to evaluate an application,
must report the name of the AUS it used to evaluate the application
and the result generated by that system, regardless of whether the
financial institution intends to hold the covered loan in its portfolio
or sell the covered loan. For example, if a financial institution
uses an AUS developed by a securitizer to evaluate an application
and intends to sell the covered loan to that securitizer but ultimately
does not sell the covered loan and instead holds the covered loan
in its portfolio, the financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name of the securitizer’s AUS
that the institution used to evaluate the application and the result
generated by that system. Similarly, if a financial institution uses
an AUS developed by a securitizer to evaluate an application to determine
whether to originate the covered loan but does not intend to sell
the covered loan to that securitizer and instead holds the covered
loan in its portfolio, the financial institution complies with section
1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name of the securitizer’s AUS
that the institution used to evaluate the application and the result
generated by that system.
iii. A financial institution that uses an AUS, as defined in section
1003.4(a)(35)(ii), that is developed by a securitizer to evaluate
an application, must report the name of the AUS it used to evaluate
the application and the result generated by that system, regardless
of whether the securitizer intends to hold the covered loan it purchased
from the financial institution in its portfolio or securitize the
covered loan. For example, if a financial institution uses an AUS
developed by a securitizer to evaluate an application and the financial
institution sells the covered loan to that securitizer but the securitizer
holds the covered loan it purchased in its portfolio, the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name
of the securitizer’s AUS that the institution used to evaluate
the application and the result generated by that system.
iv. A financial institution,
which is also a securitizer, that uses its own AUS, as defined in
section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii), to evaluate an application, must report
the name of the AUS it used to evaluate the application and the result
generated by that system, regardless of whether the financial institution
intends to hold the covered loan it originates in its portfolio, purchase
the covered loan, or securitize the covered loan. For example, if
a financial institution, which is also a securitizer, has developed
its own AUS and uses that AUS to evaluate an application that it
intends to originate and hold in its portfolio and not purchase or
securitize the covered loan, the financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name of its AUS that it used
to evaluate the application and the result generated by that system.
2. Definition
of automated underwriting system. A financial institution must
report the information required by section 1003.4(a)(35)(i) if the
financial institution uses an automated underwriting system (AUS),
as defined in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii), to evaluate an application.
To be covered by the definition in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii), a system
must be an electronic tool that has been developed by a securitizer,
Federal government insurer, or a Federal government guarantor of closed-end
mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit. A person is a securitizer,
Federal government insurer, or Federal government guarantor of closed-end
mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit, respectively, if it has
securitized, provided Federal government insurance, or provided a
Federal government guarantee for a closed-end mortgage loan or open-end
line of credit at any point in time. A person may be a securitizer,
Federal government insurer, or Federal government guarantor of closed-end
mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit, respectively, for purposes
of section 1003.4(a)(35) even if it is not actively securitizing,
insuring, or guaranteeing closed-end mortgage loans or open-end lines
of credit at the time a financial institution uses the AUS to evaluate
an application. Where the person that developed the electronic tool
has never been a securitizer, Federal government insurer, or Federal
government guarantor of closed-end mortgage loans or open-end lines
of credit, respectively, at the time a financial institution uses
the tool to evaluate an application, the financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting that the requirement is not
applicable because an AUS was not used to evaluate the application.
If a financial institution has developed its own proprietary system
that it uses to evaluate an application and the financial institution
is also a securitizer, then the financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name of that system and the
result generated by that system. On the other hand, if a financial
institution has developed its own proprietary system that it uses
to evaluate an application and the financial institution is not a
securitizer, then the financial institution is not required by section
1003.4(a)(35) to report the use of that system and the result generated
by that system. In addition, for an AUS to be covered by the definition
in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii), the system must provide a result regarding
both the credit risk of the applicant and the eligibility of the covered
loan to be originated, purchased, insured, or guaranteed by the securitizer,
Federal government insurer, or Federal government guarantor that developed
the system being used to evaluate the application. For example, if
a system is an electronic tool that provides a determination of the
eligibility of the covered loan to be originated, purchased, insured,
or guaranteed by the securitizer, Federal government insurer, or Federal
government guarantor that developed the system being used by a financial
institution to evaluate the application, but the system does not also
provide an assessment of the creditworthiness of the applicant—such
as an evaluation of the applicant’s income, debt, and credit
history—then that system does not qualify as an AUS, as defined
in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii). A financial institution that uses a
system that is not an AUS, as defined in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii),
to evaluate an application does not report the information required
by section 1003.4(a)(35)(i).
3. Reporting automated underwriting system data—multiple
results. When a financial institution uses one or more automated
underwriting systems (AUS) to evaluate the application and the system
or systems generate two or more results, the financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting, except for purchased
covered loans, the name of the AUS used by the financial institution
to evaluate the application and the result generated by that AUS as
determined by the following principles. To determine what AUS (or
AUSs) and result (or results) to report under section 1003.4(a)(35),
a financial institution follows each of the principles that is applicable
to the application in question, in the order in which they are set
forth below.
i. If a financial institution
obtains two or more AUS results and the AUS generating one of those
results corresponds to the loan type reported pursuant to section
1003.4(a)(2), the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35)
by reporting that AUS name and result. For example, if a financial
institution evaluates an application using the Federal Housing Administration’s
(FHA) Technology Open to Approved Lenders (TOTAL) Scorecard and subsequently
evaluates the application with an AUS used to determine eligibility
for a non-FHA loan, but ultimately originates an FHA loan, the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting TOTAL
Scorecard and the result generated by that system. If a financial
institution obtains two or more AUS results and more than one of those
AUS results is generated by a system that corresponds to the loan
type reported pursuant to section 1003.4(a)(2), the financial institution
identifies which AUS result should be reported by following the principle
set forth below in comment 4(a)(35)-3.ii.
ii. If a financial institution obtains
two or more AUS results and the AUS generating one of those results
corresponds to the purchaser, insurer, or guarantor, if any, the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting that
AUS name and result. For example, if a financial institution evaluates
an application with the AUS of Securitizer A and subsequently evaluates
the application with the AUS of Securitizer B, but the financial institution
ultimately originates a covered loan that it sells within the same
calendar year to Securitizer A, the financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name of Securitizer A’s
AUS and the result generated by that system. If a financial institution
obtains two or more AUS results and more than one of those AUS results
is generated by a system that corresponds to the purchaser, insurer,
or guarantor, if any, the financial institution identifies which AUS
result should be reported by following the principle set forth below
in comment 4(a)(35)-3.iii.
iii. If a financial institution obtains
two or more AUS results and none of the systems generating those results
correspond to the purchaser, insurer, or guarantor, if any, or the
financial institution is following this principle because more than
one AUS result is generated by a system that corresponds to either
the loan type or the purchaser, insurer, or guarantor, the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the AUS
result generated closest in time to the credit decision and the name
of the AUS that generated that result. For example, if a financial
institution evaluates an application with the AUS of Securitizer A,
subsequently again evaluates the application with Securitizer A’s
AUS, the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35)
by reporting the name of Securitizer A’s AUS and the second
AUS result. Similarly, if a financial institution obtains a result
from an AUS that requires the financial institution to underwrite
the loan manually, but the financial institution subsequently processes
the application through a different AUS that also generates a result,
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting
the name of the second AUS that it used to evaluate the application
and the AUS result generated by that system.
iv. If a financial institution obtains
two or more AUS results at the same time and the principles in comment
4(a)(35)-3.i through .iii do not apply, the financial institution
complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name of all of
the AUSs used by the financial institution to evaluate the application
and the results generated by each of those systems. For example, if
a financial institution simultaneously evaluates an application with
the AUS of Securitizer A and the AUS of Securitizer B, the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name
of both Securitizer A’s AUS and Securitizer B’s AUS and
the results generated by each of those systems. In any event,
however, the financial institution does not report more than five
AUSs and five results. If more than five AUSs and five results meet
the criteria in this principle, the financial institution complies
with section 1003.4(a)(35) by choosing any five among them to report.
4. Transactions
for which an automated underwriting system was not used to evaluate
the application. Section 1003.4(a)(35) does not require a financial
institution to evaluate an application using an automated underwriting
system (AUS), as defined in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii). For example,
if a financial institution only manually underwrites an application
and does not use an AUS to evaluate the application, the financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable since an AUS was not used to evaluate
the application.
5. Purchased covered loan. A financial institution complies with
section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting that the requirement is not applicable
when the covered loan is a purchased covered loan.
6. Non-natural person. When the applicant
and co-applicant, if applicable, are not natural persons, a financial
institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable.
7. Determination of securitizer, Federal government
insurer, or Federal government guarantor. Section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii)
provides that an “automated underwriting system” means
an electronic tool developed by a securitizer, Federal government
insurer, or Federal government guarantor of closed-end mortgage loans
or open-end lines of credit that provides a result regarding the credit
risk of the applicant and whether the covered loan is eligible to
be originated, purchased, insured, or guaranteed by that securitizer,
Federal government insurer, or Federal government guarantor. A person
is a securitizer, Federal government insurer, or Federal government
guarantor of closed-end mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit,
respectively, if it has ever securitized, insured, or guaranteed a
closed-end mortgage loan or open-end line of credit. If a financial
institution knows or reasonably believes that the system it is using
to evaluate an application is an electronic tool that has been developed
by a securitizer, Federal government insurer, or Federal government
guarantor of closed-end mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit,
then the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35)
by reporting the name of that system and the result generated by that
system. Knowledge or reasonable belief could, for example, be based
on a sales agreement or other related documents, the financial institution’s
previous transactions or relationship with the developer of the electronic
tool, or representations made by the developer of the electronic tool
demonstrating that the developer of the electronic tool is a securitizer,
Federal government insurer, or Federal government guarantor of closed-end
mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit. If a financial institution
does not know or reasonably believe that the system it is using to
evaluate an application is an electronic tool that has been developed
by a securitizer, Federal government insurer, or Federal government
guarantor of closed-end mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit,
the financial institution complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting
that the requirement is not applicable, provided that the financial
institution maintains procedures reasonably adapted to determine whether
the electronic tool it is using to evaluate an application meets the
definition in section 1003.4(a)(35)(ii). Reasonably adapted procedures
include attempting to determine with reasonable frequency, such as
annually, whether the developer of the electronic tool is a securitizer,
Federal government insurer, or Federal government guarantor of closed-end
mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit. For example:
i. In the course of renewing an annual
sales agreement the developer of the electronic tool represents to
the financial institution that it has never been a securitizer, Federal
government insurer, or Federal government guarantor of closed-end
mortgage loans or open-end lines of credit. On this basis, the financial
institution does not know or reasonably believe that the system it
is using to evaluate an application is an electronic tool that has
been developed by a securitizer, Federal government insurer, or Federal
government guarantor of closed-end mortgage loans or open-end lines
of credit and complies with section 1003.4(a)(35) by reporting that
the requirement is not applicable.
ii. Based on their previous transactions
a financial institution is aware that the developer of the electronic
tool it is using to evaluate an application has securitized a closed-end
mortgage loan or open-end line of credit in the past. On this basis,
the financial institution knows or reasonably believes that the developer
of the electronic tool is a securitizer and complies with section
1003.4(a)(35) by reporting the name of that system and the result
generated by that system.
Paragraph 4(a)(37) 1. Open-end line of credit. Except for partially
exempt transactions under section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(37)
requires a financial institution to identify whether the covered loan
or the application is for an open-end line of credit. See
comments 2(o)-1 and -2 for a discussion of open-end line of credit
and extension of credit.
Paragraph
4(a)(38) 1. Primary purpose. Except for partially exempt transactions under
section 1003.3(d), section 1003.4(a)(38) requires a financial institution
to identify whether the covered loan is, or the application is for
a covered loan that will be, made primarily for a business or commercial
purpose. See comment 3(c)(10)-2 for a discussion of how to
determine the primary purpose of the transaction and the standard
applicable to a financial institution’s determination of the
primary purpose of the transaction. See comments 3(c)(10)-3
and 4 for examples of excluded and reportable business- or commercial-purpose
transactions.
4(f) Quarterly Recording
of Data
1. General. Section 1003.4(f) requires
a financial institution to record the data collected pursuant to section
1003.4 on a loan/application register within 30 calendar days after
the end of the calendar quarter in which final action is taken. Section
1003.4(f) does not require a financial institution to record data
on a single loan/application register on a quarterly basis. Rather,
for purposes of section 1003.4(f), a financial institution may record
data on a single loan/application register or separately for different
branches or different loan types (such as home purchase or home improvement
loans, or loans on multifamily dwellings).
2. Agency requirements. Certain
State or Federal regulations may require a financial institution to
record its data more frequently than is required under Regulation
C.
3. Form of quarterly records. A
financial institution may maintain the records required by section
1003.4(f) in electronic or any other format, provided the institution
can make the information available to its regulatory agency in a timely
manner upon request.