(i) In general. A person that sets the material terms of credit granted, extended,
or otherwise provided to a consumer, based in whole or in part on
a credit score, may comply with the requirements of paragraph (a)
of this section by:
(A) Determining the credit score (hereafter
referred to as the “cutoff score”) that represents the point at which
approximately 40 percent of the consumers to whom it grants, extends,
or provides credit have higher credit scores and approximately 60
percent of the consumers to whom it grants, extends, or provides credit
have lower credit scores; and
(B) Providing a risk-based pricing notice to each consumer to whom
it grants, extends, or provides credit whose credit score is lower
than the cutoff score.
(ii) Alternative
to the 40/60 cutoff score determination. In the case of credit
that has been granted, extended, or provided on the most favorable
material terms to more than 40 percent of consumers, a person may,
at its option, set its cutoff score at a point at which the approximate
percentage of consumers who historically have been granted, extended,
or provided credit on material terms other than the most favorable
terms would receive risk-based pricing notices under this section.
(iii) Determining the cutoff score.
(A) Sampling approach. A person that currently
uses risk-based pricing with respect to the credit products it offers
must calculate the cutoff score by considering the credit scores of
all or a representative sample of the consumers to whom it has granted,
extended, or provided credit for a specific type of credit product.
(B) Secondary source approach in limited circumstances. A person
that is a new entrant into the credit business, introduces new credit
products, or starts to use risk-based pricing with respect to the
credit products it currently offers may initially determine the cutoff
score based on information derived from appropriate market research
or relevant third-party sources for a specific type of credit product,
such as research or data from companies that develop credit scores.
A person that acquires a credit portfolio as a result of a merger
or acquisition may determine the cutoff score based on information
from the party which it acquired, with which it merged, or from which
it acquired the portfolio.
(C) Recalculation of cutoff scores. A person using the credit score proxy method must recalculate its
cutoff score(s) no less than every two years in the manner described
in paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(A) of this section. A person using the credit
score proxy method using market research, third-party data, or information
from a party which it acquired, with which it merged, or from which
it acquired the portfolio as permitted by paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B)
of this section generally must calculate a cutoff score(s) based on
the scores of its own consumers in the manner described in paragraph
(b)(1)(iii)(A) of this section within one year after it begins using
a cutoff score derived from market research, third-party data, or
information from a party which it acquired, with which it merged,
or from which it acquired the portfolio. If such a person does not
grant, extend, or provide credit to new consumers during that one-year
period such that it lacks sufficient data with which to recalculate
a cutoff score based on the credit scores of its own consumers, the
person may continue to use a cutoff score derived from market research,
third-party data, or information from a party which it acquired, with
which it merged, or from which it acquired the portfolio as provided
in paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(B) until it obtains sufficient data on which
to base the recalculation. However, the person must recalculate its
cutoff score(s) in the manner described in paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(A)
of this section within two years, if it has granted, extended, or
provided credit to some new consumers during that two-year period.
(D) Use of two or more credit scores. A person that generally uses
two or more credit scores in setting the material terms of credit
granted, extended, or provided to a consumer must determine the cutoff
score using the same method the person uses to evaluate multiple scores
when making credit decisions. These evaluation methods may include,
but are not limited to, selecting the low, median, high, most recent,
or average credit score of each consumer to whom it grants, extends,
or provides credit. If a person that uses two or more credit scores
does not consistently use the same method for evaluating multiple
credit scores (e.g., if the person sometimes chooses the median score
and other times calculates the average score), the person must determine
the cutoff score using a reasonable means. In such cases, use of any
one of the methods that the person regularly uses or the average credit
score of each consumer to whom it grants, extends, or provides credit
is deemed to be a reasonable means of calculating the cutoff score.
(iv) Credit score not available. For purposes
of this section, a person using the credit score proxy method who
grants, extends, or provides credit to a consumer for whom a credit
score is not available must assume that the consumer receives credit
on material terms that are materially less favorable than the most
favorable credit terms offered to a substantial proportion of consumers
from or through that person and must provide a risk-based pricing
notice to the consumer.
(v) Examples.
(A) A credit
card issuer engages in risk-based pricing and the annual percentage
rates it offers to consumers are based in whole or in part on a credit
score. The credit card issuer takes a representative sample of the
credit scores of consumers to whom it issued credit cards within the
preceding three months. The credit card issuer determines that approximately
40 percent of the sampled consumers have a credit score at or above
720 (on a scale of 350 to 850) and approximately 60 percent of the
sampled consumers have a credit score below 720. Thus, the card issuer
selects 720 as its cutoff score. A consumer applies to the credit
card issuer for a credit card. The card issuer obtains a credit score
for the consumer. The consumer’s credit score is 700. Since the consumer’s
700 credit score falls below the 720 cutoff score, the credit card
issuer must provide a risk-based pricing notice to the consumer.
(B) A credit card issuer
engages in risk-based pricing, and the annual percentage rates it
offers to consumers are based in whole or in part on a credit score.
The credit card issuer takes a representative sample of the consumers
to whom it issued credit cards over the preceding six months. The
credit card issuer determines that approximately 80 percent of the
sampled consumers received credit at its lowest annual percentage
rate, and 20 percent received credit at a higher annual percentage
rate. Approximately 80 percent of the sampled consumers have a credit
score at or above 750 (on a scale of 350 to 850), and 20 percent have
a credit score below 750. Thus, the card issuer selects 750 as its
cutoff score. A consumer applies to the credit card issuer for a credit
card. The card issuer obtains a credit score for the consumer. The consumer’s
credit score is 740. Since the consumer’s 740 credit score falls below
the 750 cutoff score, the credit card issuer must provide a risk-based
pricing notice to the consumer.
(C) An auto lender engages in risk-based pricing,
obtains credit scores from one of the nationwide consumer reporting
agencies, and uses the credit score proxy method to determine which
consumers must receive a risk-based pricing notice. A consumer applies
to the auto lender for credit to finance the purchase of an automobile.
A credit score about that consumer is not available from the consumer
reporting agency from which the lender obtains credit scores. The
lender nevertheless grants, extends, or provides credit to the consumer.
The lender must provide a risk-based pricing notice to the consumer.
(i) In general. A person that sets the material
terms of credit granted, extended, or provided to a consumer by placing
the consumer within one of a discrete number of pricing tiers for
a specific type of credit product, based in whole or in part on a
consumer report, may comply with the requirements of paragraph (a)
of this section by providing a risk-based pricing notice to each consumer
who is not placed within the top pricing tier or tiers, as described
below.
(ii) Four or fewer pricing tiers. If a person
using the tiered pricing method has four or fewer pricing tiers, the
person complies with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section
by providing a risk-based pricing notice to each consumer to whom
it grants, extends, or provides credit who does not qualify for the
top tier (that is, the lowest-priced tier). For example, a person
that uses a tiered pricing structure with annual percentage rates
of 8, 10, 12, and 14 percent would provide the risk-based pricing
notice to each consumer to whom it grants, extends, or provides credit
at annual percentage rates of 10, 12, and 14 percent.
(iii) Five or more pricing tiers. If a person
using the tiered pricing method has five or more pricing tiers, the
person complies with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section
by providing a risk-based pricing notice to each consumer to whom
it grants, extends, or provides credit who does not qualify for the
top two tiers (that is, the two lowest-priced tiers) and any other
tier that, together with the top tiers, comprise no less than the
top 30 percent but no more than the top 40 percent of the total number
of tiers. Each consumer placed within the remaining tiers must receive
a risk-based pricing notice. For example, if a person has nine pricing
tiers, the top three tiers (that is, the three lowest-priced tiers)
comprise no less than the top 30 percent but no more than the top
40 percent of the tiers. Therefore, a person using this method would
provide a risk-based pricing notice to each consumer to whom it grants,
extends, or provides credit who is placed within the bottom six tiers.