In light of the large volume
of distressed residential properties and the indications of higher
demand for rental housing in many markets, some banking organizations
may choose to make greater use of rental activities in their disposition
strategies than in the past. This policy statement reminds banking
organizations and examiners that the Federal Reserve’s regulations
and policies permit the rental of residential other real estate owned
(OREO) properties to third-party tenants as part of an orderly disposition
strategy within statutory and regulatory limits.
1 This policy statement
applies to state member banks, bank holding companies, nonbank subsidiaries
of bank holding companies, savings and loan holding companies, non-thrift
subsidiaries of savings and loan holding companies, and U.S. branches
and agencies of foreign banking organizations (collectively, banking
organizations).
2
The general policy of the Federal Reserve is that banking
organizations should make good-faith efforts to dispose of OREO properties
at the earliest practicable date. Consistent with this policy, in
light of the extraordinary market conditions that currently prevail,
banking organizations may rent residential OREO properties (within
statutory and regulatory holding-period limits) without having to
demonstrate continuous active marketing of the property, provided
that suitable policies and procedures are followed. Under these conditions
and circumstances, banking organizations would not contravene supervisory
expectations that they show “good-faith efforts” to dispose of OREO
by renting the property within the
applicable holding period.
Moreover, to the extent that OREO rental properties meet the definition
of community development under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
regulations, they would receive favorable CRA consideration.
3 In all respects, banking organizations that rent
OREO properties are expected to comply with all applicable federal,
state, and local statutes and regulations.
Background Home prices have been under considerable downward pressure since
the financial crisis began, in part due to the large volume of houses
for sale by creditors, whether acquired through foreclosure or voluntary
surrender of the property by a seriously delinquent borrower (distressed
sales). Creditors, in turn, often seek to liquidate their inventories
of such properties quickly. Since 2008, it is estimated that millions
of residential properties have passed through lender inventories.
These distressed sales represent a significant proportion of all home
sales transactions, despite some ebb and flow, and thus are a contributing
element to the downward pressure on home prices. With mortgage delinquency
rates remaining stubbornly high, the continued inflow of new real
estate owned properties to the market—expected to be millions more
over the coming years—will continue to weigh on house prices for some
time.
4
Banking organizations include their holdings of such properties
in OREO on regula-tory reports and other financial statements.
5 Existing federal and state laws and regulations
limit the amount of time banking organizations may hold OREO property.
6 In addition, there are established
supervisory expectations for management of OREO properties and the
nature of the efforts banking organizations should make to dispose
of these properties during that period.
Risk Management Considerations for Residential
OREO Property Rentals In all circumstances,
the Federal Reserve expects a banking organization considering such
rentals to evaluate the overall costs, benefits, and risks of renting.
The banking organization’s decision to rent OREO might depend significantly
on the condition of individual properties, local market conditions
for rental and owner-occupied housing, and its capacity to engage
in rental activity in a safe and sound manner and consistent with
applicable laws and regulations. Banking organizations should have
an operational framework for their residential OREO rental activities
that is appropriate to the extent to which they rent OREO properties.
In general, banking organizations with relatively small holdings of
residential OREO properties—fewer than 50 individual properties rented
or available for rent—should use a framework that appropriately records
the organizations’ rental decisions and transactions as they take
place, preserves key documents, and is otherwise sufficient to safeguard
and manage the individual OREO assets.
7 In contrast, banking organizations with large inventories of
residential OREO properties
8 —50 or more individual properties avail
able for rent or rented—should utilize a framework that systematically
documents how they meet the supervisory expectations described in
the next section. All banking organizations that rent OREO properties,
irrespective of the size of their holdings, should adhere to the guidance
set forth in this section.
Compliance with
Maximum OREO Holding-Period Requirements
Banking
organizations should pursue a clear and credible approach for ultimate
sale of the rental OREO property within the applicable holding-period
limitations. Exit strategies in some cases may include special transaction
features to facilitate the sale of OREO, potentially including prudent
use of seller-assisted financing or rent-to-own arrangements with
tenants.
Compliance with Landlord-Tenant and
Other Associated Requirements
Banking organizations’
residential property rental activities are expected to comply with
all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including:
landlord-tenant laws; landlord licensing or registration requirements;
property maintenance standards; eviction protections (such as under
the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act); protections under the
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act;
9 and anti-discrimination laws, including the
applicable provisions of the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with
Disabilities Act. Prior to undertaking the rental of OREO properties,
banking organizations should determine whether such activities are
legally permissible under applicable laws, including state laws. When
applicable, banking organizations should review homeowner and condominium
association bylaws and local zoning laws for prohibitions on renting
a property. Banking organizations may use third-party vendors to manage
properties but should provide necessary oversight to ensure that property
managers fully understand and comply with these federal, state, and
local requirements.
Other Considerations
Banking organizations should account for OREO
assets in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and applicable regulatory reporting instructions.
10 Banking organizations should also provide the appropriate
classification treatment for their residential OREO holdings. Residential
OREO is typically treated as a substandard asset, as defined by the
interagency classification guidelines.
11 However, residential
properties with leases in place and demonstrated cash flow from rental
operations sufficient to generate a reasonable rate of return
12 should generally not be classified.
Specific Expectations for Large-Scale
Residential OREO Rentals Banking organizations
with large inventories of residential OREO properties that decide
to engage in rental activities should have in place a documented rental
strategy, including formal policies and procedures for OREO
rental activities, and a documented operational framework. Policies
and procedures should clearly describe how the banking organization
will comply with all applicable laws and regulations. Policies and
procedures should include processes for determining whether the properties
meet local building code requirements and are otherwise habitable,
and whether improvements to the properties are needed in order to
market them for rent. In addition, policies and procedures should
establish operational standards for the banking organization’s rental
activities, including that adequate insurance policies are in place,
that property and other tax obligations are met on a timely basis,
and that expenditures on improvements are appropriate to the value
of the property and to prevailing norms in the local market.
Policies and procedures should also
require plans for rental of residential OREO properties, down to the
individual property level, that cover the full holding period from
the time the bank received title to ultimate sale by the bank. Plans
should identify which properties would be eligible for rental. Plans
also should establish criteria by which properties are chosen for
marketing as rental properties, and the process by which rental decisions
should be made and implemented. Plans should describe the general
conditions under which the organization believes a rental approach
is likely to be successful, including appropriate consideration of
rental market and economic conditions in respective local markets.
Finally, policies and procedures should address all risk
management issues that arise in renting residential OREO properties.
Some risk elements parallel those found in other banking activities,
for example, the credit risk associated with tenants’ potential failure
to make timely rent payments, or potential conflict of interest issues
such as the use of a firm by a banking organization to both provide
information on a property’s value and list that property for sale
on behalf of the banking organization. Other risks unique to such
rental include:
- Dealing with vacancy, marketing, and re-rental of
previously occupied properties;13
- Liability risk arising from rental activities, along
with the use and management of liability insurance or other approaches
to mitigate that liability and risk; and
- Legal requirements arising from the potential need
to take action against tenants for rent delinquency, potentially including
eviction. Such requirements may include notice periods.
Banking organizations may need to develop new
policies and risk management processes to address properly these categories
of risk.
In many cases, banking organizations will use third-party
vendors (for example, real estate agents or professional property
managers) to manage their OREO properties. Policies and procedures
should provide that such individuals or organizations have appropriate
expertise in property management, be in sound financial condition,
and have a good track record in managing similar properties. Policies
and procedures should also call for contracts with such vendors to
carry appropriate terms and provide, among other key elements, for
adequate management information systems and reporting to the banking
organization, including rent rolls (along with actual lease agreements),
maintenance logs, and security deposits and charges to these deposits.
Banking organizations should provide for adequate oversight of vendors.
14 Additional Materials for Reference15
- The Board’s Policy Statement on Disposition of Property
Acquired in Satisfaction of Debts Previously Contracted, July 28,
1980. See 12 CFR 225.140.
- Instructions for Preparation of Consolidated Reports
of Condition and Income (Call Report, FFIEC 031 and 041), Schedule
RC-M item 3, available at www.ffiec.gov/PDF/FFIEC_forms/FFIEC031_FFIEC041_201109_i.pdf.
- Instructions for Preparation of the Consolidated Financial
Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9C), available at www.federalreserve.gov/reportforms/.
- Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 310-40, Receivables-Troubled
Debt Restructurings by Creditors (formerly known as FAS 15, “Accounting
by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings”).
- ASC 360-10-30, Property, Plant and Equipment-Initial
Measurement (formerly included in FAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”).
- ASC 360-10-35, Property, Plant and Equipment-Subsequent
Measurement.
- The disposition of other real estate is addressed
in ASC 360-20-40, Property, Plant and Equipment-Real Estate Sales-Derecognition
(formerly within FAS 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate”), which
includes specific criteria for the recognition of profit.
- Commercial Bank Examination Manual section
2200.1, “Other Real Estate Owned” available at www.federalreserve.
gov/boarddocs/supmanual/cbem/2000.pdf.
- SR letter 10-16, “Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation
Guidelines,” December 2, 2010. For the sale of OREO property with
a value of $250,000 or less, a bank holding company or state member
bank may obtain an evaluation in lieu of an appraisal.
- SR letter 00-17, “Statement on Risk Management of
Outsourced Technology Services,” November 28, 2000.
- SR letter 95-16, “Real Estate Appraisal Requirements
for Other Real Estate Owned (OREO),” March 28, 1995.
- CA letter 09-5, “Information and Examination Procedures
for the ‘Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009,”’ July 30,
2009.
- CA letter 05-3, “Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
of 2003,” May 6, 2005.
Policy statement of April 5, 2012 (SR-12-5).