Subpart B of this part incorporates
the provisions of article 4A set forth in appendix A of this part.
The provisions set forth expressly in the sections of subpart B of
this part supersede or preempt any inconsistent provisions of article
4A as set forth in appendix A of this part or as enacted in any state.
The official comments to article 4A are not incorporated in subpart
B of this part or this commentary to subpart B of this part, but the
official comments may be useful in interpreting article 4A as set
forth in appendix A of this part. Because section 4A-105 refers to
other provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (e.g., definitions
in article 1 of the UCC), these other provisions of the UCC, as approved
by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws,
which is now also known as the Uniform Law Commission, and the American
Law Institute, from time to time, are also incorporated into subpart
B of this part. Subpart B of this part applies to any party to a funds
transfer over the Fedwire Funds Service that is in privity with a
Federal Reserve Bank. These parties include a sender (bank or nonbank)
that sends a payment order directly to a Federal Reserve Bank, a receiving
bank that receives a payment order directly from a Federal Reserve
Bank, and a beneficiary that receives credit to an account that it
uses or maintains at a Federal Reserve Bank as payment for a payment
order accepted by a Federal Reserve Bank. Other parties to a funds
transfer over the Fedwire Funds Service are covered by subpart B of
this part to the same extent subpart B would apply to them if subpart
B were a “funds-transfer system rule” under article 4A that selected
subpart B of this part as the governing law.
The scope of the applicability of a funds-transfer system
rule under article 4A is specified in section 4A-501(b), and the scope
of the choice of law provision is specified in section 4A-507(c).
Under section 4A-507(c), a choice of law provision is binding on the
participants in a funds-transfer system and certain other parties
having notice that the funds-transfer system might be used for the
funds transfer and of the choice of law provision. The Uniform Commercial
Code provides that a person has notice of a fact when the person has
actual knowledge of it, receives a notice or notification of it, or
has reason to know that it exists from all the facts and circumstances
known to the person at the time in question. (See UCC section
1-202.) However, under sections 4A-507(b) and 4A-507(d), a choice
of law by agreement of the parties takes precedence over a choice
of law made by funds-transfer system rule.
If originators, receiving banks, and beneficiaries that
are not in privity with a Federal Reserve Bank have the notice contemplated
by section 4A-507(c) or if those parties agree to be bound by subpart
B of this part, subpart B of this part generally would apply to payment
orders between those remote parties, including participants in other
funds-transfer systems. For example, a payment order may be sent from
an originator’s bank through a funds-transfer system other than the
Fedwire Funds Service to a receiving bank which, in turn, executes
that payment order by sending a payment order through the Fedwire
Funds Service. Similarly, a Federal Reserve Bank may send a payment
order through the Fedwire Funds Service to a receiving bank that sends
it through a funds-transfer system other than the Fedwire Funds Service
to the beneficiary’s bank. In the first example, if the originator’s
bank has notice that the Fedwire Funds Service may be used to effect
part of the funds transfer, the sending of the payment order through
the other funds-transfer system to the receiving bank will be governed
by subpart B of this part unless the parties to the payment order
have agreed otherwise. In the second example, if the beneficiary’s
bank has notice that the Fedwire Funds Service may be used to effect
part of the funds transfer, the sending of the payment order to the
beneficiary’s bank through the other funds-transfer system will be
governed by subpart B of this part unless the parties have agreed
otherwise. In both cases, the other funds-transfer system’s rules
would also apply to, at a minimum, the portion of these funds transfers
being made through that funds transfer system. Because subpart B of
this part is federal law, subpart B of this part will take precedence
over any funds-transfer system rule applicable to the remote sender
or receiving bank or to a Federal Reserve Bank to the extent of any
inconsistency. If remote parties to a funds transfer, a portion of
which is sent through the Fedwire Funds Service, have expressly selected
by agreement, in accordance with section 4A-507(b), a law other than
subpart B of this part, subpart B of this part would not take precedence
over the choice of law made by the agreement even though the remote
parties had notice that the Fedwire Funds Service might be used and
of the governing law. (See section 4A-507(d).) In addition,
subpart B of this part would not apply to a funds transfer sent through
another funds-transfer system where no Federal Reserve Bank handles
the funds transfer, even though settlement for the funds transfer
is made by means of a separate net settlement or funds transfer through
the Fedwire Funds Service.
Under section 4A-108, article 4A does not apply to a funds
transfer any part of which is governed by the Electronic Fund Transfer
Act (EFTA) (15 U.S.C. 1693 et seq.). In general, Fedwire funds
transfers to or from consumer accounts are exempt from the EFTA and
Regulation E (12 CFR part 1005). A funds transfer from a consumer
originator or a funds transfer to a consumer beneficiary could be
carried out in part through the Fedwire Funds Service and in part
through an automated clearinghouse or other means that is subject
to the EFTA or Regulation E. In these cases, subpart B would not govern
the portion of the funds transfer that is governed by the EFTA or
Regulation E. (See the commentary to section 210.26 in this
appendix, “Payment Order”.)
Section 919 of the EFTA, however, governs
“remittance transfers,” which may include funds transfers over the
Fedwire Funds Service. Section 919 of the EFTA sets out the obligations
of remittance transfer providers with respect to consumer senders
of remittance transfers. Section 919 of the EFTA generally does not
affect the rights and obligations of financial institutions involved
in a remittance transfer. To the extent that a Fedwire funds transfer
is a “remittance transfer” governed by section 919 of the EFTA, it
continues to be governed by subpart B of this part, except that, in
the event of an inconsistency between the provisions of subpart B
of this part and section 919 of the EFTA, section 919 of the EFTA
shall prevail. For example, a consumer may initiate a remittance transfer
governed by EFTA section 919 from the consumer’s account at a depository
institution, and the depository institution may initiate that transfer
by sending a payment order to a Federal Reserve Bank through the Fedwire
Funds Service. If the consumer subsequently exercised the right to
cancel the remittance transfer and obtain a refund under the terms
of section 919 of the EFTA, the depository institution would be required
to comply with section 919 even if the institution does not have a
right to reverse the payment order sent to the Federal Reserve Bank
under subpart B of this part.
Finally, section 4A-404(a) provides that a beneficiary’s
bank is obliged to pay the amount of a payment order to the beneficiary
on the payment date unless acceptance of the payment order occurs
on the payment date after the close of the funds-transfer business
day of the bank. The Expedited Funds Availability Act provides that
funds received by a bank by wire transfer shall be available for withdrawal
not later than the business day after the business day on which such
funds are received (12 U.S.C. 4002(a)). That act also preempts any
provision of state law that was not effective on September 1, 1989,
that is inconsistent with that act or its implementing Regulation
CC (12 CFR part 229). Accordingly, the Expedited Funds Availability
Act and Regulation CC may preempt section 4A-404(a) as enacted in
any state. In order to ensure that section 4A-404(a), or other provisions
of article 4A, as incorporated in subpart B of this part, do not take
precedence over provisions of the Expedited Funds Availability Act,
this section 210.25(b)(4) provides that where subpart B of this part
establishes rights or obligations that are also governed by the Expedited
Funds Availability Act or Regulation CC, the Expedited Funds Availability
Act or Regulation CC provision shall apply and subpart B of this part
shall not apply.